• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Mike Lull Club Part 4

ah.. forgot to say: 35"
Very cool...I'm 35 fan myself (I think we are surprisingly in the minority) There is something pure and solid with Black & Maple. I have a M5v with that combo.
You have a keeper DG...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DriesG
FWIW, 34 fan here. Did the 35 thing, even still have a few, don't mind them at all, but 34 is just more familiar territory for me both physically and audibly. The myth that 35 is required to have a great B string has been long debunked by all the great builders/luthiers out there (including Lull), so it really is just a comfort/tone thing.
 
FWIW, 34 fan here. Did the 35 thing, even still have a few, don't mind them at all, but 34 is just more familiar territory for me both physically and audibly. The myth that 35 is required to have a great B string has been long debunked by all the great builders/luthiers out there (including Lull), so it really is just a comfort/tone thing.
I will admit for me its a technique thing first for me (cliff-note version, I plan cleaner)...However I dig the tone as well.
 
FWIW I don't think it's a myth: it's physics. They just sound and feel different because of the differences in thickness, tension etc...
34" or 35": it's a personal thing. I like both. And I really like Mike's basses. :D
You misread my post. I said it's a myth that you have to have a 35" scale to have a great B string. I didn't say they'd sound the same. In fact I pointed out there would be tonal diffs.

SO NYAH!!! lol :)
 
I chose a 34" scale length M5V for comfort, plus I prefer the sound of 34" or smaller on the G-string. I was pleasantly surprised at how good the B-string sounds on it. With new strings, it may even be clearer than the other strings. Is it possible that it is because the string through the body?

With no disrespect to the Lulls (34" or 35"), but nothing beats the clarity of the 37" scale length B on a Dingwall. Maybe a 38" Quake (they're even more rare than Dingwalls)? But then you'd have the same scale on the other strings so it would be a trade-off.
 
So Mike received my P4 today and I heard back from Paul. He said that like some of you indicated, the lines on the fretboard are normal, though he's going to buff the fretboard a little bit more and check the frets and it should be on its way back to me sometime this week.
 
I prefer 34" scale...they are just more comfortable for me to play. I've had several 34 scale 5-strings and all of them have had great sounding B-Strings...However, I've had some cabs that made the B-string sound like crap...
 
So Mike received my P4 today and I heard back from Paul. He said that like some of you indicated, the lines on the fretboard are normal, though he's going to buff the fretboard a little bit more and check the frets and it should be on its way back to me sometime this week.
Did he give you an explanation as to what exactly those lines are? It feels to me as if the fingerboard between the frets is covered and that the lines are where the cover ends. Weird, but that's what it seems like.
 
Did he give you an explanation as to what exactly those lines are? It feels to me as if the fingerboard between the frets is covered and that the lines are where the cover ends. Weird, but that's what it seems like.

It's what someone else explained probably a few pages back. When he sprays the neck, some of the finish builds up on either side of the frets. He takes a razor blade and scores the finish off next to the frets and then buffs it out. Mine just had a bit more of the finish left in spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bass12