Mark Wilson
Supporting Member
Just so I can figure it out... Are the pickups 70's spacing?
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Just so I can figure it out... Are the pickups 70's spacing?
I know the best thing to do before I ask is to go back through this whole thread - but honestly, I am lazy.
Does anyone have a fretless Lull? M5V specifically, but any model will work too... Or does anyone have pics they're keeping around?
My GAS list changes almost daily but a fretless has been a mainstay and I was thinking how great it would be to have another Lull... I missed out on the PJ5 on eBay recently.![]()
Just so I can figure it out... Are the pickups 70's spacing?
I know the best thing to do before I ask is to go back through this whole thread - but honestly, I am lazy.
Does anyone have a fretless Lull? M5V specifically, but any model will work too... Or does anyone have pics they're keeping around?
My GAS list changes almost daily but a fretless has been a mainstay and I was thinking how great it would be to have another Lull... I missed out on the PJ5 on eBay recently.![]()
Well, someone in our club decided to get rid of his M5... I don't how but I'm thinking I gotta make this happen.
Question for you Mike Lull owners:
Darn near every lull I've seen is lovely - but the few I've played seemed exactly like a fender to me. I guess what I was hoping for was that whole "Sadowsky Feel"... Am I missing something here?
Well, as far as I can tell that is Mike's goal - to make his basses feel like vintage Fenders but with modern appointments like preamps, 5-strings, etc. My M5V feels more like a vintage Fender than my previous Fender CS. And it sounds like J, even with the Bart preamp it still sounds like a J - not the J on steroids that people normally describe Sadowsky's as.
What do you mean by "Sadowsky Feel"??? The logical solution is to get a Sadowsky if that's what you're after (right?)... As much as they are both J (or P) style instruments they are very different from each other.
Well, if I had tons of disposable income, I'd gladly get a Sadowsky... BUT I DON'T. Hence my interest in a Mike Lull.
Given that Lull's seem to be made to pretty high standards, use nice parts, are often just gorgeous, I keep thinking they should just have *that feel*. Perhaps I've just not found the right one, I dunno. Can some one tell me if they use the smaller body's ala Sadowsky, or are they the stock Fenders size?
Well, IMHO having played both, the Sadowsky is a real different animal. What YCBass said is correct, his view is a vintage jazz bass with modern features. With the Sadowsky's, it may look like a jazz bass but it won't be an exact copy of a vintage Fender. IMHO and IME the only way to get the Sadowsky tone is to have a Sadowsky.
IMHO, BOTH the Lull and Sadowsky basses are modern takes on the J. There's no such thing as a Fender J with a 35" scale, and that really does change the tone. Not in the same way as the Sadowsky preamp, but enough to where I don't think either instrument, as great as they each are, could ever be called truly faithful to a genuine Fender J sound. Just depends on what kind of twist on the J you want most.Well, IMHO having played both, the Sadowsky is a real different animal. What YCBass said is correct, his view is a vintage jazz bass with modern features. With the Sadowsky's, it may look like a jazz bass but it won't be an exact copy of a vintage Fender. IMHO and IME the only way to get the Sadowsky tone is to have a Sadowsky.
Well, if I had tons of disposable income, I'd gladly get a Sadowsky... BUT I DON'T. Hence my interest in a Mike Lull.
Given that Lull's seem to be made to pretty high standards, use nice parts, are often just gorgeous, I keep thinking they should just have *that feel*. Perhaps I've just not found the right one, I dunno. Can some one tell me if they use the smaller body's ala Sadowsky, or are they the stock Fenders size?
Very true. Lull's are amazing values.For me one of the biggest selling points for Lulls is the price - for the same $2800 that you'd spend on a Sadowsky Metro UV70-5 you can get a custom US made Lull with your choice of electronics, woods, finish, etc.
The M5V is a full size J body, the edges are a little more square than Fender, the Modern (M5 or M4) is the downsized body. I've also seen M4V's with a smaller body - care to fill in CaptainWally???
The one Sadowsky I played was an NYC 24-fret 5, the neck was thicker than my Lull - I really love the neck on mine.
Build quality is excellent just like Sadowsky's...
For me one of the biggest selling points for Lulls is the price - for the same $2800 that you'd spend on a Sadowsky Metro UV70-5 you can get a custom US made Lull with your choice of electronics, woods, finish, etc.
The M5V is a full size J body, the edges are a little more square than Fender, the Modern (M5 or M4) is the downsized body. I've also seen M4V's with a smaller body - care to fill in CaptainWally???
The one Sadowsky I played was an NYC 24-fret 5, the neck was thicker than my Lull - I really love the neck on mine.
Build quality is excellent just like Sadowsky's...
For me one of the biggest selling points for Lulls is the price - for the same $2800 that you'd spend on a Sadowsky Metro UV70-5 you can get a custom US made Lull with your choice of electronics, woods, finish, etc.
All this, IMHO.
IMHO, BOTH the Lull and Sadowsky basses are modern takes on the J. There's no such thing as a Fender J with a 35" scale, and that really does change the tone. Not in the same way as the Sadowsky preamp, but enough to where I don't think either instrument, as great as they each are, could ever be called truly faithful to a genuine Fender J sound. Just depends on what kind of twist on the J you want most.![]()
What if you want a Lull to sound like a Hondo?![]()

