• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The new Doug Wimbish Spector

Yeah that’s the going rate for US Spector more or less.

I feel like the OP is misinformed though. From the video I’m seeing, the pic posted here isn’t like a default or standard finish. In the launch video I see several basses with transparent finishes over maple. Like. You know. Any good NS2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bste9
A painted bass ain't worth that kind of money. If the wood were something really special (and you didn't paint it), maybe. But you'd have to have a long enough upper horn for the thing to balance, well, and not a PJ pickup arrangement, and... OK, I'm picky.
At $90 the only requirement is that it works when plugged in. At $9000 that thing should be made of a tree struck by lightning, and if it's a solid colour, I had better NOT be able to tell where the joints between each board on the body are.

Picky is relative to price in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I’d be happier if the redwood bodied NS5 XL signature model Spector made for Alejandra Villareal became a regular catalog item for them. I wouldn’t mind owning a lighter weight Spector fiver than my Euro is.
 
Last edited:
Picky is relative to price in my opinion.

On some things, yes, but on others, no. I don't care if you pay me to take it, I won't play a bass that is heavy, unbalanced, or that has reach issues. Spectors fail the reach issue (the 14th or 15th fret horn, and the space behind the bridge move the nut to the left), and are generally not balanced well or light. I also don' t like the comb filtering on the close side of a PJ pickup configuration. A bunch of non starters here for me.
 
On some things, yes, but on others, no. I don't care if you pay me to take it, I won't play a bass that is heavy, unbalanced, or that has reach issues. Spectors fail the reach issue (the 14th or 15th fret horn, and the space behind the bridge move the nut to the left), and are generally not balanced well or light. I also don' t like the comb filtering on the close side of a PJ pickup configuration. A bunch of non starters here for me.

With my Spector, I found any reach issues were fixed by simply having the neck more vertical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arthur U. Poon
A painted bass ain't worth that kind of money. If the wood were something really special (and you didn't paint it), maybe. But you'd have to have a long enough upper horn for the thing to balance, well, and not a PJ pickup arrangement, and... OK, I'm picky.
Yes, at that price it better have AAAA quilted maple that looks like a hologram, and two or three types of exotic wood possibly for the top, fretboard and neck. A boutique bass for a boutique price.
 
Does it play $5600 better? $6k is an insane price tag for a bass guitar.

Adjusted for inflation, the original prices for the Fender Precision and Jazz were close to $3k in current dollars.

The NS-2 had a list price of $2000 in 1984. That is equivalent to about $6000 in current dollars.

$6k isn’t insane. It has effectively 40 years of precedent.

The only difference is that now you can get better quality in a lower priced instrument than you used to.

A $400 bass isn’t anywhere close to a $2k-$3k bass, but there are diminishing marginal returns in most cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adamrobertt