Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The search ends here... (Warwick and Spector content)
- Thread starter MisterMagician
- Start date
If you put it like that, then I do understand what you are getting at.
Ryan's Thumb gives this woody punch, while Rex's is more of the aggressive growl.
The problem with that analogy though is that I am not looking at a Thumb or a REX
The other problem is that I don't like Mudvayne or Pantera.
True and I understand there's a difference between the Streamer and a Thumb, but it's still the same basic Warwick tone. And as far as Rex's tone goes, most of his recorded work has been with a regular US Spector, not the Rex basses.
311's Peanut uses a Streamer - he's got some really good tone. And Nickelback's Mike Kroeger uses a Spector and he's got great tone. And if you're not a fan of either of those, check out some more artists. There are plenty out there.
I guess if I had to define the difference, I'd say that Spectors are thicker while Warwicks are more "airy" and sound better tuned way down (as opposed to Alex Webster's terrible indiscernible tone with Cannibal Corpse using a Spector). Personally, I prefer the Spector sound, and the way they play. I played a Euro (zebrano bolt-on model) and it is really the best bass I've ever played in twice that price range. The only thing that runs up any kind of competition with it is the $4000 Warwick Streamer Stage II...and even then I'd probably favor Spector because I hate the sensitivity of Warwick's oil finishes. Dream bass is probably either an American Spector (spalted maple top bolt-on) or a custom Warwick Buzzard... neither of which I have any real hope of ever being able to afford. I'm okay with that, though, since the Euro is within a somewhat reasonable price range and will, once I have secured it, do all that I need it to. You see, I currently use a Warwick Corvette Standard (passive) and I hate the oil finish and overall sensitivity. While it does stay in tune beautifully, the slightest drop of sweat will gray the finish immediately and I'll have to grab my wax and go to it... not overly convenient for someone who plays metal. There is also an issue with a large dead spot between the 8th and 12th frets on the G string... I miss using that E! I'm looking forward to the day I can afford to upgrade!
Maybe I'm missing something here,but doesnt the title & poll say,"Streamer $$ 5"?
That bass has 2 passive MEC humbuckers,or "$$".
Please,dont get offended by my post.Just trying to make sense of it is all.
Just to clarify,
It's not the actual finish that is soft,but the wood under it.Now most models have bodies of various hard woods,there are some,like ash & cherry,that are notoriously soft,so you have to be carefull if ya wanna keep the wood dentless.
Re.Your deadspot.That could be a set up issue,or a high fret that just needs fixing.A well set up Warwick neck will be as consistent across the fingerboard as they come.
Cheers mate.
Read the OP.Maybe I'm missing something here,but doesnt the title & poll say,"Streamer $$ 5"?
That bass has 2 passive MEC humbuckers,or "$$".
Please,dont get offended by my post.Just trying to make sense of it is all.
The twin-jazz PUs come in the twin-jazz config, not the $$ config.
ahhh sorry bout that mate.I had a feeling it was me.
The MEC twin jazz is a great pickup.2 single coils in series/splittable.Positioed at the bridge,the little buggers are a great addition to add clarity,definition & growl.On a fretless they just ooze muaaah!Add one to the neck position as well as the bridge & you getta config that cant be matched in terms of versatility.
76 to 75 now.
Admittedly, I have wanted the Warwick more than the Spector since I made this thread, but I got Gallop Meets the Earth this week and that has renewed my interest in Spectors
