• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Sushi Box FX Secret Society

I was super bummed when I missed out on the first run of the PMLE. Randomly dropped into the thread Thursday night to find out there was another run and hadn't yet sold out. Time to welcome a new Sushi pedal to the family:

1000008329.jpg


Going to mess with it tonight and see if it will kick the Super 800 + Finally V2 combo I've been using off my board. Spoiler alert, it probably will lol.
 
My UA arrived at my house Friday literally as I was heading out of town for the night. I was able to play with it last night and it was what I was looking for. Thanks for the advice. Sounds great.
To be safe, I bought the power supply but if I wanted to use it with my 1spot pro would i plug into one of 9v 500mA slots? Not the 9v 100mA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tidbits and jmmyoh
After following this page for awhile I finally decided to join in on the fun. This is my current Sushi Box collection. I do run an HX stomp between the UA and Neptunium but since I’ve gotten these the HX is mostly for a drop tune and the occasional chorus or slight bit of reverb.
I honestly don’t think I could get any better tone than this. Still won’t stop me from getting more pedals but this configuration sounds Big and Fat! Sushi Box has definitely dug it’s claws in on me😆😆

Nathan has been so pleasant and helpful every time I’ve emailed. I’m excited to add some more Sushi to my life.
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpeg
    FullSizeRender.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 16
I was super bummed when I missed out on the first run of the PMLE. Randomly dropped into the thread Thursday night to find out there was another run and hadn't yet sold out. Time to welcome a new Sushi pedal to the family:

View attachment 7251454

Going to mess with it tonight and see if it will kick the Super 800 + Finally V2 combo I've been using off my board. Spoiler alert, it probably will lol.
Please do report back. I’ve been super curious to try the Super 800 and compare it to Venus Z (or PMLE).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feral
Please do report back. I’ve been super curious to try the Super 800 and compare it to Venus Z (or PMLE).
So, I may have been distracted rewiring my pedalboard Saturday night and not checking out the PMLE. I did get some time tonight though and did a quick comparison against the Super 800 + Finally V2 (with a Mullard reissue 12AU7) combo using a Stingray. I didn't have any of the tone switches engaged on the Super 800, so this was narrowed down to the 4 band EQ and general tone.

They both have a similar character, but the EQ feels very different on the high end. I had to set the treble at about 25% on the Super 800/Finally combo with my band, and it gets harsh pretty quickly going past 50%. The PMLE has less high end at 50%, but can be brought out by turning up the treble knob, being pretty usable all the way up.

The JJ tube in the PMLE compresses a bit much for me and had that "JJ" character. I swapped in a Sovtek 12AX7WB which compared to the JJ has less compression, a fatter low end, and less emphasis in the high mids which brings out a bit more clarity. Sounds way better than I had dialed in with the Super 800/Finally V2 combo. Definitely a keeper!
 
Q for Nathan:

One of my gigs only requires a monitor wedge for the bass in the stage mix; and I’ve been using a QSC K10.2.

But, I’ve run into an issue trying to send a preamp signal to both the monitor wedge and the FoH board, either with the parallel thru port on the K10.2 or by putting an XLR Y cable on the Venus. I described the problem in the Live Sound forum:


I originally thought I had some issue in the K10.2. But, now it seems there is something I am missing about the balanced XLR send to multiple loads. For the moment, I’ve been solving the issue by sending to the two target amps from two different preamps. Is there something about the Output Impedance of the XLR send on the Venus, which affects parallel sends? If so, can that limitation be addressed by design; or is there a fundamental problem with that kind of signal chain?

Thanks!
 
Q for Nathan:

One of my gigs only requires a monitor wedge for the bass in the stage mix; and I’ve been using a QSC K10.2.

But, I’ve run into an issue trying to send a preamp signal to both the monitor wedge and the FoH board, either with the parallel thru port on the K10.2 or by putting an XLR Y cable on the Venus. I described the problem in the Live Sound forum:


I originally thought I had some issue in the K10.2. But, now it seems there is something I am missing about the balanced XLR send to multiple loads. For the moment, I’ve been solving the issue by sending to the two target amps from two different preamps. Is there something about the Output Impedance of the XLR send on the Venus, which affects parallel sends? If so, can that limitation be addressed by design; or is there a fundamental problem with that kind of signal chain?

Thanks!

When I use a monitor, I run my XLR out to the board. Then they send back to my monitor with a vocal and bass mix. Will that not work?
 
Q for Nathan:

One of my gigs only requires a monitor wedge for the bass in the stage mix; and I’ve been using a QSC K10.2.

But, I’ve run into an issue trying to send a preamp signal to both the monitor wedge and the FoH board, either with the parallel thru port on the K10.2 or by putting an XLR Y cable on the Venus. I described the problem in the Live Sound forum:


I originally thought I had some issue in the K10.2. But, now it seems there is something I am missing about the balanced XLR send to multiple loads. For the moment, I’ve been solving the issue by sending to the two target amps from two different preamps. Is there something about the Output Impedance of the XLR send on the Venus, which affects parallel sends? If so, can that limitation be addressed by design; or is there a fundamental problem with that kind of signal chain?

Thanks!
I'm not intimately familiar with the K10.2's technical specs, but I will say that in general passive splitters are not an ideal solution as they can set you up for impedance issues.

It looks like the balanced input on the K10.2 has an input impedance of 40kΩ, which is well above the 600Ω output impedance of the Venus Z XLR output, so there shouldn't be any issue there by itself. However I don't have any information on your FOH board, and that may be the missing piece to the puzzle. Mixers typically have a low input impedance for the balanced lines, so if the XLR input impedance on the board is 600Ω or close to it, that would mean that you're ending up with an equivalent impedance of less than 600Ω because of the parallel loads, and that would be too much for the Venus Z to supply by itself.

My best recommendation would be to use the 1/4" output from Venus to the K10.2 and the XLR to the FOH. If the K10.2 is being used as your "amp", there shouldn't be a real need to use a balanced line from the preamp to it. The 1/4" output has a buffer that isolates it from the XLR output, and this is the exact sort of scenario that made me want to add this buffer in.

[stop here if you're satisfied with that answer and don't need overly technical explanations of things]

Some basic impedance information that should help if any of this sounds weird:

Impedance is sometimes simplified as "resistance", which is partially true, but it's resistance that is variable depending on the frequency of the source signal. The part that seems a little backwards is that a lower impedance is electrically a "heavier" load. So a low input impedance means an electrically heavy load, and a low output impedance means an electrically "strong" signal that would be capable of driving this heavier load. A high input impedance is a light load, and a high output impedance is an electrically "weaker" signal.

In high power environments like amplifiers into speakers you want to match the output impedance of a device as closely as possible to the input impedance of the next device. With low power devices like preamps or pedals in general, you want the output impedance of a device to be significantly lower than the input impedance of the next device in line. For example, if the pickups of your bass have a 20kΩ impedance, it's perfectly reasonable to have a 1MΩ input impedance. If you're using a piezo pickup with a 2MΩ impedance, a preamp with a 1MΩ input impedance would be too "heavy" of a load for that pickup, and the tone would be impacted. This is why it is common for acoustic-oriented preamps to have 5.6MΩ or 10MΩ input impedance.

This is where things like buffers come in. A buffer will generally have a high input impedance and a low output impedance, which makes it the perfect tool to put between devices that otherwise would have impedances that don't go well together. If you're driving to drive a power amp that has a 20kΩ input impedance, something like an Underground Accelerator will struggle due to its 38kΩ output impedance. More, on the other hand, has an output impedance around 500Ω and is capable of driving much heavier loads. Since More has an input impedance of 5.6MΩ it's an easy load for Underground Accelerator to push, and the 500Ω output impedance of More can then do the heavy lifting into the power amp's input, so UA -> More -> amplifier would be a perfect chain to put together for that case.

So what happens when you have one source (like a Venus Z) hooked up to two loads? When two impedances are hooked up in parallel, you find the equivalent impedance with the equation 1/(1/X1 + 1/X2) with X1 being the first impedance and X2 being the second. So if we have a 40kΩ input impedance for X1 and a 600Ω input impedance for X2, then our total load is

1/(1/40000 + 1/600)

1/(0.000025 + 0.00166)

1/0.00169166 = 591Ω

It's not a lot lower than 600Ω, but we're definitely starting to get to the point where tone and signal strength will be impacted. It's also obvious here that the higher the impedance of a device, the less it's going to affect the overall equivalent impedance. 591Ω is a lot closer to 600Ω than it is to 40kΩ. So if we add another 40kΩ load in parallel it won't do much to the overall impedance, but if we add another 600Ω load it will drop the equivalent impedance significantly.

Thanks for coming to my lecture, make sure you read chapters 11-12 tonight and this will be on the quiz tomorrow morning.
 
I'm not intimately familiar with the K10.2's technical specs, but I will say that in general passive splitters are not an ideal solution as they can set you up for impedance issues.

It looks like the balanced input on the K10.2 has an input impedance of 40kΩ, which is well above the 600Ω output impedance of the Venus Z XLR output, so there shouldn't be any issue there by itself. However I don't have any information on your FOH board, and that may be the missing piece to the puzzle. Mixers typically have a low input impedance for the balanced lines, so if the XLR input impedance on the board is 600Ω or close to it, that would mean that you're ending up with an equivalent impedance of less than 600Ω because of the parallel loads, and that would be too much for the Venus Z to supply by itself.

My best recommendation would be to use the 1/4" output from Venus to the K10.2 and the XLR to the FOH. If the K10.2 is being used as your "amp", there shouldn't be a real need to use a balanced line from the preamp to it. The 1/4" output has a buffer that isolates it from the XLR output, and this is the exact sort of scenario that made me want to add this buffer in.

[stop here if you're satisfied with that answer and don't need overly technical explanations of things]

Some basic impedance information that should help if any of this sounds weird:

Impedance is sometimes simplified as "resistance", which is partially true, but it's resistance that is variable depending on the frequency of the source signal. The part that seems a little backwards is that a lower impedance is electrically a "heavier" load. So a low input impedance means an electrically heavy load, and a low output impedance means an electrically "strong" signal that would be capable of driving this heavier load. A high input impedance is a light load, and a high output impedance is an electrically "weaker" signal.

In high power environments like amplifiers into speakers you want to match the output impedance of a device as closely as possible to the input impedance of the next device. With low power devices like preamps or pedals in general, you want the output impedance of a device to be significantly lower than the input impedance of the next device in line. For example, if the pickups of your bass have a 20kΩ impedance, it's perfectly reasonable to have a 1MΩ input impedance. If you're using a piezo pickup with a 2MΩ impedance, a preamp with a 1MΩ input impedance would be too "heavy" of a load for that pickup, and the tone would be impacted. This is why it is common for acoustic-oriented preamps to have 5.6MΩ or 10MΩ input impedance.

This is where things like buffers come in. A buffer will generally have a high input impedance and a low output impedance, which makes it the perfect tool to put between devices that otherwise would have impedances that don't go well together. If you're driving to drive a power amp that has a 20kΩ input impedance, something like an Underground Accelerator will struggle due to its 38kΩ output impedance. More, on the other hand, has an output impedance around 500Ω and is capable of driving much heavier loads. Since More has an input impedance of 5.6MΩ it's an easy load for Underground Accelerator to push, and the 500Ω output impedance of More can then do the heavy lifting into the power amp's input, so UA -> More -> amplifier would be a perfect chain to put together for that case.

So what happens when you have one source (like a Venus Z) hooked up to two loads? When two impedances are hooked up in parallel, you find the equivalent impedance with the equation 1/(1/X1 + 1/X2) with X1 being the first impedance and X2 being the second. So if we have a 40kΩ input impedance for X1 and a 600Ω input impedance for X2, then our total load is

1/(1/40000 + 1/600)

1/(0.000025 + 0.00166)

1/0.00169166 = 591Ω

It's not a lot lower than 600Ω, but we're definitely starting to get to the point where tone and signal strength will be impacted. It's also obvious here that the higher the impedance of a device, the less it's going to affect the overall equivalent impedance. 591Ω is a lot closer to 600Ω than it is to 40kΩ. So if we add another 40kΩ load in parallel it won't do much to the overall impedance, but if we add another 600Ω load it will drop the equivalent impedance significantly.

Thanks for coming to my lecture, make sure you read chapters 11-12 tonight and this will be on the quiz tomorrow morning.
As an EE, I really appreciate the level of detail provided! The information about the output impedance of the UA and input and output impedances of More is especially valuable.

Extra credit topic: I'd like to make a couple minor, tangential points about output and load impedances for power amplifiers. An amp's rated load impedance is indeed the impedance at which it can deliver the most power; but that is not the same as the output impedance of the power amplifier. Without diving into math, the output impedance is simple to understand as a measure of how much the output voltage is affected by the load impedance.

For most solid-state amps, the output impedance is much lower than the load impedance it is rated to drive. A lower load impedance won't affect the output voltage much, but it will draw more current. A load impedance that is too low can draw so much current that the output transistors are damaged. This is much like plugging too many things into one power circuit - the power line voltage doesn't change much, but at some point a circuit breaker will trip.

For most tube amps, the output impedance is also lower than the rated load impedance. If the load impedance is too low, the output tubes saturate and can't deliver more current, and the voltage drops (less power). This can be hard on the output tubes, but usually not immediately destructive. If the load impedance is too high, the output tubes will try to deliver their maximum current, driving up the voltage, but the maximum output power is limited by the available voltage swing. In the extreme case, this can produce excessive voltage at the plates of the output tubes which can damage the output transformer, the tubes, or the tube sockets (because the excessive voltage arcs across the socket to chassis ground).

I'm glossing over a few complexities (especially with tubes) in this explanation.

Anyway, off topic for an effects thread... now I'm hungry for More Sushi.... ;)
 
I'm not intimately familiar with the K10.2's technical specs, but I will say that in general passive splitters are not an ideal solution as they can set you up for impedance issues.

It looks like the balanced input on the K10.2 has an input impedance of 40kΩ, which is well above the 600Ω output impedance of the Venus Z XLR output, so there shouldn't be any issue there by itself. However I don't have any information on your FOH board, and that may be the missing piece to the puzzle. Mixers typically have a low input impedance for the balanced lines, so if the XLR input impedance on the board is 600Ω or close to it, that would mean that you're ending up with an equivalent impedance of less than 600Ω because of the parallel loads, and that would be too much for the Venus Z to supply by itself.

My best recommendation would be to use the 1/4" output from Venus to the K10.2 and the XLR to the FOH. If the K10.2 is being used as your "amp", there shouldn't be a real need to use a balanced line from the preamp to it. The 1/4" output has a buffer that isolates it from the XLR output, and this is the exact sort of scenario that made me want to add this buffer in.

[stop here if you're satisfied with that answer and don't need overly technical explanations of things]

Some basic impedance information that should help if any of this sounds weird:

Impedance is sometimes simplified as "resistance", which is partially true, but it's resistance that is variable depending on the frequency of the source signal. The part that seems a little backwards is that a lower impedance is electrically a "heavier" load. So a low input impedance means an electrically heavy load, and a low output impedance means an electrically "strong" signal that would be capable of driving this heavier load. A high input impedance is a light load, and a high output impedance is an electrically "weaker" signal.

In high power environments like amplifiers into speakers you want to match the output impedance of a device as closely as possible to the input impedance of the next device. With low power devices like preamps or pedals in general, you want the output impedance of a device to be significantly lower than the input impedance of the next device in line. For example, if the pickups of your bass have a 20kΩ impedance, it's perfectly reasonable to have a 1MΩ input impedance. If you're using a piezo pickup with a 2MΩ impedance, a preamp with a 1MΩ input impedance would be too "heavy" of a load for that pickup, and the tone would be impacted. This is why it is common for acoustic-oriented preamps to have 5.6MΩ or 10MΩ input impedance.

This is where things like buffers come in. A buffer will generally have a high input impedance and a low output impedance, which makes it the perfect tool to put between devices that otherwise would have impedances that don't go well together. If you're driving to drive a power amp that has a 20kΩ input impedance, something like an Underground Accelerator will struggle due to its 38kΩ output impedance. More, on the other hand, has an output impedance around 500Ω and is capable of driving much heavier loads. Since More has an input impedance of 5.6MΩ it's an easy load for Underground Accelerator to push, and the 500Ω output impedance of More can then do the heavy lifting into the power amp's input, so UA -> More -> amplifier would be a perfect chain to put together for that case.

So what happens when you have one source (like a Venus Z) hooked up to two loads? When two impedances are hooked up in parallel, you find the equivalent impedance with the equation 1/(1/X1 + 1/X2) with X1 being the first impedance and X2 being the second. So if we have a 40kΩ input impedance for X1 and a 600Ω input impedance for X2, then our total load is

1/(1/40000 + 1/600)

1/(0.000025 + 0.00166)

1/0.00169166 = 591Ω

It's not a lot lower than 600Ω, but we're definitely starting to get to the point where tone and signal strength will be impacted. It's also obvious here that the higher the impedance of a device, the less it's going to affect the overall equivalent impedance. 591Ω is a lot closer to 600Ω than it is to 40kΩ. So if we add another 40kΩ load in parallel it won't do much to the overall impedance, but if we add another 600Ω load it will drop the equivalent impedance significantly.

Thanks for coming to my lecture, make sure you read chapters 11-12 tonight and this will be on the quiz tomorrow morning.
Many thanks for your detailed response.

My error was not considering the different input impedances. Of course, the Venus will send the bulk of its power to the path of least resistance. The Mackie input port I was using has an input impedance of 3.4 kohm. Small wonder the signal power goes there rather than the 40 kohm input on the QSC with a parallel connection. Mea culpa.

For whatever reason, the K10.2 does not perform as well with the unbalanced 1/4” output.

I’ll just stay with my current dual preamp configuration. That seems to provide the most option versatility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sushi Box FX
@Sushi Box FX
Have you ever looked at the schematics for the Demeter VTBP-201S to see if it could be stuffed into a pedal?
I haven't seen a schematic floating around, but based on what I've seen from gutshots I think there's a pretty good chance it could be miniaturized. It's a good looking unit, I actually almost pulled the trigger on one a year or so ago but talked myself out of it.
 
I haven't seen a schematic floating around, but based on what I've seen from gutshots I think there's a pretty good chance it could be miniaturized. It's a good looking unit, I actually almost pulled the trigger on one a year or so ago but talked myself out of it.
I had one on loan for evaluation (and possible purchase at a really nice price) earlier this year. I didn't buy it - too clean for me! But clear without being sterile, a very fine preamp, I bet people who play slap style (I don't) would love it for the transparent headroom.
 
The Demeter VTBP-201 preamp has been my #1 for the past two decades. I have two of the 1 1/2 space original units, one with the Minnie 800D power section refitted inside it. I also have a Bass 400 in the dove cage format and two Minnie 800D units. Obviously, a big Demeter fan.

A pedal board version of the 201 preamp would be amazing. James recently put a product out there, called the Toolbox; which is essentially a 201 preamp with a 175W power amp in a pedalboard friendly size. I think it is actually the Bass 400 chassis. It’s a cool idea; but it does not seem to be a big seller.

James is in the later stages of his career. He can be a bit opinionated etc. But, I think it would be worthwhile exploring some kind of partnership with him. He does have access to a different slice of pro clients. A collaborative product could be a really good thing for both companies. Just a thought.