TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've been getting a lot of specific questions lately, both in the thread and via PM and email, I'm wondering if it may be a good time to do another live Q&A session. I did one a couple years ago and enjoyed it, and I planned for it to be more regular, but it never ended up happening again.
I don't mind questions in any form and am always happy to answer anything I can wherever it's asked, sometimes it just feels like I can answer better in person (or virtually in person) so you can see my weird facial expressions and vague hand gestures as I explain things![]()
I enjoyed the Q&A and our phone conversation.I've been getting a lot of specific questions lately, both in the thread and via PM and email, I'm wondering if it may be a good time to do another live Q&A session. I did one a couple years ago and enjoyed it, and I planned for it to be more regular, but it never ended up happening again.
I don't mind questions in any form and am always happy to answer anything I can wherever it's asked, sometimes it just feels like I can answer better in person (or virtually in person) so you can see my weird facial expressions and vague hand gestures as I explain things![]()
Any recommendations for a power amp?
The Zoom amp models are fair for getting the gist of a particular amp, but far from capturing the full performance. There are several generations with the current revisions being much more detailed with separate speaker sims. I would judge the older B3, MS are 50-60% there and the newer are 75% accurate but really lack in the tone stack and saturation characteristics where it most matters. Zoom uses the same 'tone stack' on all their amps, big mistake.Thanks...how did your Zoom pedals compare to your Sushi pedals?

The Zoom amp models are fair for getting the gist of a particular amp, but far from capturing the full performance. There are several generations with the current revisions being much more detailed with separate speaker sims. I would judge the older B3, MS are 50-60% there and the newer are 75% accurate but really lack in the tone stack and saturation characteristics where it most matters. Zoom uses the same 'tone stack' on all their amps, big mistake.
Sushi Box get closer to 100% to the preamp sound and most modellers are 90+%.
I still use my Zoom pedals for the sounds I have designed as well as modulation, delay, reverb, EQ and ZNR becuase they sound good enough, fast and ez to get the sounds I want and they are small.
View attachment 4897011
You should have no buyers remorse, but beware @Sushi Box FX pedals are habit forming.Thanks for that...sounds like my choice of Sushi was a good one. Can't wait to try them!
You should have no buyers remorse, but beware @Sushi Box FX pedals are habit forming.
I started with a Particle Accelerator, Echosaurus, Underground Accelerator, Smoke Signal, Finally, HWUA, MORE, Slampegg Bee mini tube and my collection isn't much compared to many here. There are a couple in the works I will immediately purchase and we never know what Senor will come up with next.
Thanks for the warning. Currently, my needs are modest. An Ampeg and Fender vintage tube amp tone is what I am looking for. My PF20T does most of this for the studio but, I want to see (hear) what tube preamps can do for a Class D gigging amp. Things have come a long way since the '60s, as I am learning and appreciating.
I already answered that earlier in this thread and in my post. The effects loop comes after the preamp which cannot be defeated in the 350. If you want the Slampegg as your tone, you need just a power amp to take the signal of the Slampegg pre. The tone stacks will be similar (but slightly different) between the 350 and Slampegg, so from that perspective it wouldn't make sense anyway. If you are just looking to "warm up" the 350's sound, you would need something like the Vampire Slayer (which is discontinued) in the effects loop to add some tube-y warmth before hitting the power stage.
@SoulReflection, This is actually exactly what you want for running pedals into the FX Return. Anything that you plug into the FX Return gets fed straight to the Master Volume, Limiter, and Power Amp on the PF350. The preamp is "defeated" in that you're plugging in to the amp after the preamp circuitry. Whether the Slampegg is suitable for this I cannot say, but I've heard the output is a tad low.
View attachment 4897130
We are close in age so I understand, I just missed playing bass in the 60's, I was still playing cello and guitar. I fondly recall all those long forgotten amps like Standel that were once mainstays. In Texas Fender was king of amps or Marshall for Rock, Ampeg never got a foothold - they were not carried at the main Ray Hennig's Heart of Texas Music chain. It was Fender, Marshall, Peavey, Standel, Randall and Gibson for the most part.Thanks for the warning. Currently, my needs are modest. An Ampeg and Fender vintage tube amp tone is what I am looking for. My PF20T does most of this for the studio but, I want to see (hear) what tube preamps can do for a Class D gigging amp. Things have come a long way since the '60s, as I am learning and appreciating.
FWIW, I do this quite often with my Aguilar TH500. I'll run an external preamp (either a tube preamp, or my pedalboard, or whatever) into the FX Return, which bypasses the whole front end of the amp and goes straight into the poweramp. It's a great way to make the most of the equipment you have available, rather than having to buy different amps for every flavour of the week. Plus, if anything ever happens on a gig , you can just unplug the preamp and plug into the regular Input on your amp as an instant backup.Thanks for that. Maybe the SCR-DI would increase the output? It seems to do that for everything else...
The SCR-DI would also impart it's own addition to the tone, so consider that. If you need more output but want the pure @Sushi Box FX sound then consider a transparent boost like the TC Spark Mini but not all boost pedals are transparent, many have their own characteristic sound that some find desirable.Thanks for that. Maybe the SCR-DI would increase the output? It seems to do that for everything else...
We are close in age so I understand, I just missed playing bass in the 60's, I was still playing cello and guitar. I fondly recall all those long forgotten amps like Standel that were once mainstays. In Texas Fender was king of amps or Marshall for Rock, Ampeg never got a foothold - they were not carried at the main Ray Hennig's Heart of Texas Music chain. It was Fender, Marshall, Peavey, Standel, Randall and Gibson for the most part.
My violet sparkle Dr. Wattson is out for delivery right now. I’m interested in the comparison between my hand wired Dr. Wattson on and the mini tube.There are still bargains as well as discontinued pedals and finishes available at the @Sushi Box FX Garage Sale!!
Get some before they are gone gone gone!
Garage Sale – Sushi Box FX
View attachment 4897259
FWIW, I do this quite often with my Aguilar TH500. I'll run an external preamp (either a tube preamp, or my pedalboard, or whatever) into the FX Return, which bypasses the whole front end of the amp and goes straight into the poweramp. It's a great way to make the most of the equipment you have available, rather than having to buy different amps for every flavour of the week. Plus, if anything ever happens on a gig , you can just unplug the preamp and plug into the regular Input on your amp as an instant backup.
One thing you can't do with this method, however, is easily switch between your external preamp and the amp preamp. Once you're plugged in to the FX Return, you'd have to unplug that and plug in to the front if you want to switch. So this method doesn't really work as a "Second Channel" effect or anything like that. It's all or nothing.