Agreed, I like it.IMO, purely academic, Vapor X is a great name for anything.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agreed, I like it.IMO, purely academic, Vapor X is a great name for anything.
So. Just hypothetically. Purely academic. If a pedal were to have like:
EQ section: Bass/Lo-Mids/Lo-Mids frequency/Hi-Mids/Hi-Mids Frequency/Treble
Filter Section: HPF On-Off/HPF Frequency/HPF Q/LPF On-Off/LPF Frequency/LPF Q
Does that feel like a bit much? I feel like I could find a good spot to fix both Q settings that could justify getting rid of those controls, but none of the others feel very optional.
Not to promote another company's product here....more to justify your thoughts on this theoretical product....your idea reminds me a lot of the Genzler RE/Q but your would have tubes added (presumably to add the tube-tone element?). I wouldn't call the Re/Q a preamp - it's most a tone enhancer and correction unit (that's how I use it) - but it's essentially a 5 band peaking EQ with HP and LP filters (with adjustable roll off frequency). I find mine really useful. Interesting that the Re/Q does have a frequency center around 630Hz that has had some discussion here. I don't find this frequency useful with a mid present P bass, but with a Jazz or PJ I find that 630 adds both a little bottom end AND some mid range poke without being nasal all at the same time. It's an interesting frequency for sure.
Thank you…I love early morning flights…Ah, the redeye
Have a safe flight.
I saw that; noticed it didn't last longGot another More on the way... Offer far to good to refuse on Reverb! Looking forward to seeing how it stacks with the other More![]()
Having your preamp and DI as separate boxes adds to the flexibility of setups and imho more desirable.Ok, I had a thought (dangerous I know). This may have been addressed already but it’s a long thread. The Finally has one tube and pedals like UA, Elementary, and Slampegg have one tube. Their enclosures are similar sizes, and I would say two of them would be similar in size together to say a Dreamcatcher or Detective.
Would it be possible to combine in one pedal and have say the UA DI or Elem DI? Would there be any demand for that? I think a lot of users are running one into another.
Hmmm?
Having your preamp and DI as separate boxes adds to the flexibility of setups and imho more desirable.
Good reason to collect all of the @Sushi Box FX preamps.
I think that was mine?!Got another More on the way... Offer far to good to refuse on Reverb! Looking forward to seeing how it stacks with the other More![]()
I think that was mine?!
Hey mate, yes! She's all packaged up. Just waiting on a delivery, and then I'll pop down to the post officeDid it have the red tape on?? If so it was!
2xMORE is insane...in a good way lol!