And what the heck, how about some more photos?
![]()
man, i sooooooooooooooooooo wanna put 6550's in there, but i was told it voids the warranty.
i'm a 6550 guy at heart, and would love to try it.
tom have you tried biasing for different tubes?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And what the heck, how about some more photos?
![]()
man, i sooooooooooooooooooo wanna put 6550's in there, but i was told it voids the warranty.
i'm a 6550 guy at heart, and would love to try it.
tom have you tried biasing for different tubes?

I would argue that having a label which expressly includes the 6550 would certainly open the topic up for debate as to whether or not it should be covered under warranty, should any issue arise.
I haven't tried any other tubes yet (I just love it as is!), but that is certainly on my 'to do' list.![]()
Good grief, look at the mid-cut on that!
I hate to admit that on a pic like that, I noticed that too. Cutting the mids on an amp like this is kind of like putting curb feelers on a Rolls Royce.
Not if you are slapping and popping. FWIW, those controls are at the suggested slap 'n' pop setting in the Sadowsky manual.
I don't know any slappers (pro) that scoop the mids. It might sound cool by itself but not in a mix. The ears perceive a slap tone (like Marcus) as scooped because of the defined highs and lows. Really though, there are PLENTY of mids in most good slap tones.....which is why they are punchy and round.
I don't know any slappers (pro) that scoop the mids. It might sound cool by itself but not in a mix. The ears perceive a slap tone (like Marcus) as scooped because of the defined highs and lows. Really though, there are PLENTY of mids in most good slap tones.....which is why they are punchy and round.