• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Un-Official Sadowsky SA200 Thread...

IMPRESSION: SA COMPLETE PACKAGE

I thought my Kern IP 777 preamp into a Crown K2 amp and EA VL210 cab produced great results. I never
thought my sound good be better. I was wrong.

The SA200 running straight into the SA410 is an experience and sensation of pure sonic beauty. I really
can't believe how good it it is. It's not hype; it's real. Shockingly 3D and warm .... clear or wonderfully gritty
at the player's whim. The SA200 was very good when running into my EA cab. But that 210 box eats up power
like a bull shark set loose on a school of goldfish. With the SA410, the greater efficiency is appreciated and the electric bass guitar displays more clarity, separation, definition, and multi dimensional nirvana than with the Euphonic Audio cabinet. Slap and pop or fingerstyle...I hear and feel so much more: string windings, changes in finger pressure and position, dynamics. A very visceral encounter.

Glad to hear that this rig is working so well for you! Man, that amp and those cabs just go so well together! :bassist: :bassist: :bassist: :D
 
IMPRESSION: SA COMPLETE PACKAGE

I thought my Kern IP 777 preamp into a Crown K2 amp and EA VL210 cab produced great results. I never thought my sound could be better. I was wrong.

The SA200 running straight into the SA410 is an experience and sensation of pure sonic beauty. I really can't believe how good it it is. It's not hype; it's real. Shockingly 3D and warm .... clear or wonderfully gritty at the player's whim. The SA200 was very good when running into my EA cab. But that 210 box eats up power like a bull shark set loose on a school of goldfish. With the SA410, the greater efficiency is appreciated and the electric bass guitar displays more clarity, separation, definition, and multi dimensional nirvana than with the Euphonic Audio cabinet. Slap and pop or fingerstyle...I hear and feel so much more: string windings, changes in finger pressure and position, dynamics. A very visceral encounter.

I am fortunate to have landed one of the last three SA200 heads at the Sadowsky shop. It's a shame the amp did not sell well enough to allow it to propagate into more homes, studios and stages. Everbody should be able to relish this ear candy.

Sadowsky Audio clearly deserves THE HOLY COW AWARD:

holycow.jpg

.
.


When I was at Tom's place, I had to stop playing through it because it sounded so good!
And I could never afford one!!!!:D

Man does that amp sound good.
You lucky bastard!!!!!;)

OT.......Hey Jim, what's up with your samples on cdBaby (of your disc)???
They sound dis-jointed at times. Sorta like when tracks get corrupted and un-align themselves in something like Pro-Tools or DP.
 
This thread has been burried long enough. Which cabinets are you guys using with the SA200? The Sadowsky cabs? Bergs?

My faves are the NV series cabs from Jim B, two SA410's (whoa, Momma!), EA NM-410, Phil Jones 9B/6T, and most recently, the Berg HS410. The HS410 goes deeper than the SA410, and has a more balanced midrange response, with great fullness and clarity from top to bottom. The SA410 has a bit more midrange punch, but it's a broad, even midrange 'push', as opposed to a 'hump' or 'peak.'

Tom.
 
I would die for a SA200 & SA410!!!!
That is one rig I wouldn't mind about the weight!!!!

I have an Eden WT800 and 210XLT& 210XST I'll swap for the above!!:D
Heck, I'll even toss in a 1 pound bag of M&M's!!!
 
I would die for a SA200 & SA410!!!!
That is one rig I wouldn't mind about the weight!!!!

I have an Eden WT800 and 210XLT& 210XST I'll swap for the above!!:D
Heck, I'll even toss in a 1 pound bag of M&M's!!!

Peanut or regular? ;)

Actually, from the specs, the SA200 is fairly light. For an all tube amp, it is actually mind bogglingly light.

The 4x10s are up there though.
 
My faves are the NV series cabs from Jim B, two SA410's (whoa, Momma!), EA NM-410, Phil Jones 9B/6T, and most recently, the Berg HS410. The HS410 goes deeper than the SA410, and has a more balanced midrange response, with great fullness and clarity from top to bottom. The SA410 has a bit more midrange punch, but it's a broad, even midrange 'push', as opposed to a 'hump' or 'peak.'

Tom.

Wow, that's alot of cabbage. I should have hung on to my NV cabs.
 
My faves are the NV series cabs from Jim B, two SA410's (whoa, Momma!), EA NM-410, Phil Jones 9B/6T, and most recently, the Berg HS410. The HS410 goes deeper than the SA410, and has a more balanced midrange response, with great fullness and clarity from top to bottom. The SA410 has a bit more midrange punch, but it's a broad, even midrange 'push', as opposed to a 'hump' or 'peak.'

Tom.

Aw.... Tom, I thought my GAS was done!! Would you say that the HS410 is more inherently versatile than the SA410??? I've been using the SA410 a lot, and I do find myself boosting the bass more on my amp or bass than I did with my HT322 (duh..). but now you have me intrigued about the HS410..... Anyone have one in SoCal?
 
I've been using the SA410 a lot, and I do find myself boosting the bass more on my amp or bass than I did with my HT322 (duh..). but now you have me intrigued about the HS410..... Anyone have one in SoCal?
Hmm....I find the SA410 has fairly prodigious bass. Far less dark than my EA VL210, much more in your face in a good way, and a zillion times more efficient. I don't have any Bergantino cabs to compare to.

I am supposed to have a second SA410 arrive next week.
 
Hmm....I find the SA410 has fairly prodigious bass. Far less dark than my EA VL210, much more in your face in a good way, and a zillion times more efficient. I don't have any Bergantino cabs to compare to.

I am supposed to have a second SA410 arrive next week.

There aren't many cabs darker sounding or less efficient than a VL210! The SA410 was designed with very tight speaker surrounds that result in a rather rolled off low end that makes that cab mimic a sealed cab's low end response. Of course, reduced bass response results in high efficiency.. loud per watt, which is also a good thing for the moderate power of the SA200. It was designed specifically for use with the SA200.. i.e., to control that big low end that would not typically sound good with a ported cab. When the SA200 was discontinued, the SA410 lost its reason for being.

From what I understand, the HS410 is a revoiced SA410 that uses more standard speaker surrounds to extend the low end so that the cab has bass response more appropriate to moderate power SS heads.

Both the HS410 (which I haven't had the pleasure of trying yet) and the SA410 (which I have) are quite different from the earlier large HT boxes, which have almost the opposite driver design... extreme hi xmax woofers and a huge horn crossed over low enough to plug the upper mid hole caused by the somewhat reduced upper mid response of the high xmax woofers, resulting in an uber crisp, wide, deep, studio monitor type tone (to my ears anyway). As a result, they are relatively inefficient (though not as bad as the VL210) due to the wonderful, deep bass response.

Cool stuff.... different cabs for different purposes and tone goals.... just FYI.
 
There aren't many cabs darker sounding or less efficient than a VL210! The SA410 was designed with very tight speaker surrounds that result in a rather rolled off low end that makes that cab mimic a sealed cab's low end response. Of course, reduced bass response results in high efficiency.. loud per watt, which is also a good thing for the moderate power of the SA200. It was designed specifically for use with the SA200.. i.e., to control that big low end that would not typically sound good with a ported cab. When the SA200 tanked, the SA410 lost it's reason for being.

From what I understand, the HS410 is a revoiced SA410 that uses more standard speaker surrounds to extend the low end so that the cab has bass response more appropriate to moderate power SS heads.

Both the HS410 (which I haven't had the pleasure of trying yet) and the SA410 (which I have) are quite different from the earlier large HT boxes, which have almost the opposite driver design... extreme hi xmax woofers and a huge horn crossed over low enough to plug the upper mid hole caused by the somewhat reduced upper mid response of the high xmax woofers, resulting in an uber crisp, wide, deep, studio monitor type tone (to my ears anyway).

Cool stuff.... different cabs for different purposes and tone goals.... just FYI.


Well OK but ...that's just like.....your opinion, man.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Serious knowledge base. Thanks.
 
Aw.... Tom, I thought my GAS was done!! Would you say that the HS410 is more inherently versatile than the SA410??? I've been using the SA410 a lot, and I do find myself boosting the bass more on my amp or bass than I did with my HT322 (duh..). but now you have me intrigued about the HS410..... Anyone have one in SoCal?

Yes, I would say that the HS410 is a bit more versatile than the SA410, as it has a tad wider (deeper) frequency range, and a more balanced response from top to bottom. For most applications, I think I will find myself favoring the HS410, in fact. But, the SA410 has a bit more bark and growl, though, and to be honest, I think it might be a better fit for the DB 750 (and several other heads). The 750 has massive lows (and the SA410's can take some bass boost, if need be), but the SA410's added midrange push is a very good thing with the DB 750, if you ask me.

While I'd say I prefer the HS410 on the whole, I can see the SA410 outperforming the HS410 in certain applications.

Tom.