The lower horn looks awful, and the 3+1 trademark thing is BS. I hate them for that.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I thought the first MM clone would have been from G&L? However seeing as how they were both from Leo, I'm not sure that would be considered a "clone".The rest of it: they copied a MM and parts of the very first serious MM clone from Lakland.
These are obvious MM knockoffs but for a different perspective on the shape, compare it to a Lakland ...
View attachment 5330361
These are obvious MM knockoffs but for a different perspective on the shape, compare it to a Lakland ...
View attachment 5330361
Agreed. The Lakland was competing with the Peavey Milennium. Not the Stingray.To me, the lakland is significantly different than the Stingray, in fact, if it didn't have a humbucker MM style pickup im unsure you would draw much of a comparison towards the two at all. The sire literally has an extremely similar control plate, pickguard, and its even trying to mimic the headstock, if they didn't turn the horn into a stub it would be the exact same outline as well.
Have you looked at the G&L Kiloton ? I am thinking about one.Looks like it will have p-bass nut width like the Sterling ray34. (4-string version) I wish it had Jazz bass nut width like the Sterling Ray24. I love the feel and sound of the Sterling Ray24 but I have had really bad luck with multiple copies of that model. Terrible quality control. I have been looking for a better Stingray alternative that won't put me in the poor house.
This. If you want one get one now. Suspect there will be lawyers involved and the basses won't survive the process. I sure hope I'm wrong though.3+1 headstock too? There's some lawyers suiting up...