Just wanted to pick the collective brain here on one of the most active clubs on TB. Generally speaking....I can't for the life of me figure out why the newer Thunderbird NR has so many negative reviews. I understand it may not be everyone's cup 'o tea, but it seems to get a thumbs down more often than not by YouTube reviewers. For those of you that have 'em, does your experience line up with the disdain for this model? I definitely dig mine. Looks amazing, sounds thick, and has great clarity, IMO. Here's a pic of my NR with my '79 bicentennial bird:

I know there are gonna be folks in this particular club that obviously like the NR. I'm trying to figure out why the consensus of most YT reviewers seem to feel similarly. I do tend to wonder if the same would hold true if there were a different name on the headstock. There's a couple vids (I think several folks from here) that are actually favorable, but otherwise it seems heavily slanted towards negativity.
I have an assortment of Gibson and other brand Tbirds in both reverse and non reverse layout, as well a numerous other Fender, Spector, Warwick, Alembic, etc other brands of basses. First and foremost, I’d say to enjoy or appreciate a Tbird of any type you have to like the sound that humbuckers bring to the table. It’s not a single coil sound by any stretch. It’s very much in the P bass family of sound but IMHO a bit more on the bottom and the top. Within the Tbird family is the new NR. It does bring a couple of notable differences to the mix - the body shape and associated ergonomics and a slightly different sound somewhere between the aggressiveness of an Eppi VP Tbird and the smoothness of a modern Gibby Reverse Tbird.
I just received my NR a couple of weeks ago as a gift from my wife (she’s a keeper, so’s the wife). Build, fit and finish and Quality Control are top notch, haven’t found any flaws anywhere. Hardware and electronics are top notch, nothing cheap feeling or looking about the tuners or bridge or other parts. Ergonomics while sitting are better than any Fender I own, perfectly balanced, no neck dive sitting, and none standing. Weight is fairly light for a twin pup bass at about 8 pounds. Reach to first position isn’t noticeably better or worse than any other 34” scale bass I own. Sound wise, it’s thick and bold, a perfect bass for driving a solid foundation for the band, not as in your face as the VP, but certainly no shrinking violet.
This bass can do anything a Fender P bass can do and then some. Which begs the question - at $2200 for, in essence, a vintage reissue of an iconic 1960’s bass, is it priced right? Compared to a newly released Fender American Vintage II Precision Bass at $2100…
Fender American Vintage II 1960 Precision Bass - 3-tone Sunburst
it’s in the right ball park. Both are American made and considered flagship basses by their respective companies. My only complaint about the NR is it didn’t go far enough down the vintage reissue path. They could have installed the two part bridge from the Eppi VP to complete the look and they could have used the exact same pickup locations from the original to complete the vintage sound. Both are relatively easy aftermarket fixes if you want, but by no means are they a necessity.
That’s my lobster review! And BTW, I pay zero attention to YouTube reviews unless the bass is owned by the reviewer. It’s too easy to write off a good bass that has bad strings or is connected to a bad amp or is reviewed by a person with a bad opinion. Give me an owner that has spent some time with it, changed the stock strings, tried it through a couple of different amps and played it side by side with competitors offerings and I’ll listen to what they have to say.
Obligatory pic…
Last edited:
