• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I’m beginning to wonder. It’s the middle of June and today the high was about 68F and cloudy all day. It doesn’t feel like we’ve had more than a couple weeks of sunshine since November (which is unheard of around here). I think yesterday may have been the hottest day of the year for us at a whopping 75F.
NYC is hotter than Southern California. Sure, that makes sense.
 
Thunderbird people, if you had a choice between a 2012 reverse TB and a 2020 non-reverse TB and they were about the same price (maybe $50 difference including shipping), which would you lean towards? Both are being sold by reputable shops and are described as never broken. The 2012 has some finish rubbed off where the lower wing connects to the neck through part of the body. Both have original the original bridge and tuners.
NR most likely. But I love my '06 with LaBella Black Nylons. The NR should be more more expensive, so if close to the same price, it would be the better deal (assuming the reverse isn't over priced).
 
NR’s are starting to grow on me.
And that could be a very dangerous thing.
Whatever you do, don't by one of these awful colors. There are a couple better options.*
1.jpeg



*Who am I kidding. Others can kid themselves, I just can't do it. Burgundy sounds the best.
 
I vaguely recall a news report that snow was expected.

And some complementary mathing:
Average annual rainfall can be thought of as a midpoint between highs and lows. In very few years will precipitation actually be average. It will be made up of overs and unders. The drought of the last few years are your unders. Now you are getting your overs. I don't know how wide the error bars on your rainfall are, but given history, I expect they are quite large.

IIRC, California does not have a good rainfall capture system to replenish the reservoirs. So the surplus this year will not abate future droughts. I could be wrong and would be happy to be corrected.
The quote is “California does not have a water issue, it has a water storage issue.”
 
My comparable:
In the 80s a lot got past the examiners and ended up in court. There was the long case in DNA patents in that era. Every new gene sequence found was patented. Of course, a patent requires utility and so the 'use' was "searching for its complement'. As a result, an appeals court struck down the vast majority of gene patents as the 'use' was obvious and not really useful. It is now exceedingly difficult to patent a newly discovered gene.

Were there any challenges (i.e. did they ever sue for infringement)? It would be pretty straightforward to find some prior art. And obviousness would be challenged in court.

Looking at the history, a patent was issued. It doesn't say if it was challenged or not, but it did expire a few years after issue for non-payment of fees. So by mid 90s there was no patent protection. The cited patents include such things as a banjo knee rest. A good attorney would be spinning that as obviousness in court. It may not be worth the legal fees to defend and thus was allowed to lapse. A great deal of speculation on my part.
Hohner made an excellent (non graphite) rendition of that bass and most of the hardware (if not all) had engraved patent notices pointing at Steinberger….
 
Last edited:
you can always rest the crotch (I know AHEM) of the V (no not you your Highness:D) on your right thigh (left for Ken) and although not optimal they’ll play ok that way……the little gizmo that would fold out on Steinberger ST-2s was clever……rightfully patentable imho….

Wait, are we talking about my right thigh here? :woot:


Probably not, but a girl can dream.

Non Reverse lovey.
YDidVv7.jpg