• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I am a big fan of EBCFs. Also Kevin Smith Rockmaster strings when I go to rounds. One of these years, I plan to set up the '91 and '01 with Rockmasters and get the pickups and action as close to the same as possible. The '91 has Thunderbucker pickups and the '01 is stock. The goal is to eliminate variables as much as possible to see if there's much difference in the sound.
I’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.

If I go with the Gibson I would get a second hand 1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
 
1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?

I have five Gibsons, ‘95, ‘97, 2x’01’s and an ‘03. They are all awesome and feel great. I will tell you there is a difference between my ‘95 and ‘97 and the ‘01’s and ‘03. The ‘95 and ‘97 used different tuners than the post 2000’s ones, with the set screw being offset, while the 2000’s models the set screw is centered. Also the pickguard screw holes in the ‘90’s ones are in a different location than the post 2000 ones.

I have my eye on a ‘99, and it has all the same above characteristics as the ‘95 and ‘97, so I think there was some change right around 2000.

Also, to me, my ‘90’s ones feel a little more handmade where the 2000’s ones are more “manufactured” feeling. The 2 ‘01’s and the ‘03 I have are just kind of “precise” feeling while the ‘95 and ‘97 feel a little more rugged.

As far as the 3 point bridge, I replaced it on all of them with the Babicz. I also replaced the TB+ pickups with various aftermarket versions, ala, Lollar, Novak, Thunderbucker, and Gibson re-issue. And trim rings all around.

IMG_5503.jpeg


From left to right, ‘95, ‘97, ‘01, ‘03, and ‘01

I also have 2 Eppi VP, and they are great basses, I’m definitely in love with my white 2017, with TI “Power Bass” rounds.
 
Last edited:
I’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.

If I go with the Gibson I would get a second hand 1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
I’m generally ok with the three-point for most of my Thunderbirds. But I prefer the Babicz drop in replacement. Some like the Hipshot Supertone. Great company, but I’ve tried one on two Thunderbirds now and just couldn’t get the action as low as I like. I also think the Babicz looks better.
 
Needless to say, I didn’t spend much time outside:eek:
Home is a little better. It will only be -14 tonight;)

A balmy 20 tonight in Seattle, Fraser River outflow!
 
… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
In keeping with the unofficial policy in this club to continue to perpetuate negative myths and exaggerations about Tbirds in an effort to drive the desire to own one down and thereby make them more affordable so we can buy more of them - the answer is YES, the three point bridge is a horrid abomination that should never have even been invented much less used, never purchase a bass with a three point bridge!

Now, the dirty little secret that’s just between us club members - the three point bridge is a perfectly functional design that is easy to adjust and holds perfect intonation. It’s a robust design void of cheap little easily lost grub screws and is preset to exactly match the radius of the neck. It’s relatively smooth on top if you like to rest your hand on the bridge for palm muting and is more windmill friendly than some after market bridges.

Things to know - the bridge saddle and intonation screw assembly is not locked into the bridge body. That means if you take the strings off the bass and flip the bass over, the saddle assembly will fall out. No BFD - just drop them back in, takes one second. Better yet, don’t flip the bass over in the first place and you’ll never have to worry about it. On rare occasion, it is possible for a body anchor to pull loose, it happens but the fix is usually easy and painless. Of my 15 Tbirds it’s only happened on one, and that was a bass I got used which had been thoroughly abused by its previous owner, so they may have messed it up. About the only other problem area is that some string silks are long enough they come in contact with the saddle, you can cut the silk off if it bothers you or you can install a mod bar or claw behind the bridge to seat the ball end in.

If you’re so inclined - there are a couple of perfectly good after market bridge options you can use to replace your perfectly good three point bridge. They will run you a bit over $100 each and offer some advantages over the stock three point. Hipshot makes one, it allows adjustable string spacing. Babicz makes one and it offers….a cool design.
 
Last edited:
Just unboxed this beauty, my first Thunderbird two days after my birthday-

Rather gonsmacked as it was listed B-stock (40 % off) with pictures of some paint missing from spots on the upper and lower edges of the headstock and a tear in the case near the handle -

However the bass was flawless- the only flaw was the tear in the case cover-

IMG_6106.jpeg


IMG_6103.jpeg


IMG_6102.jpeg


The case has that tear but that’s what a case is for- I will say that it’s quite heavy to lug around though the bass itself is light.

IMG_6107.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.

If I go with the Gibson I would get a second hand 1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
This takes care of the “silks on saddles”issue:D
IMG_1942.jpeg
 
My commute is ten steps from my front door to my truck. Then typically anywhere from 50 to 200 miles driving during the day, depending on where my job (or jobs) are that day. I have clients/systems I manage as far south as Pebble Beach/Monterey, and as far north/east as Truckee/Lake Tahoe. I do a good job missing a lot of the commute traffic, since I usually do get out the door until after 9, but if I am on my way back home at 5 to 6 pm, I can get hung up in it since I live very near one of the bridges that cross the SF Bay. And Thursdays are the worst. I think a substantial amount of people that live way out in the valley and beyond maybe stay in the Bay Area Monday through Wednesday night and go home after work on Thursdays. I’d guess Monday mornings coming in from the valley are terrible too.

Most days, my commute is from the breakfast table to the other end of the house - 15 seconds? Once every week or two it's about a half hour each way (I can cherry pick the commute times most days).
 
Just unboxed this beauty, my first Thunderbird two days after my birthday-

Rather gonsmacked as it was listed B-stock (40 % off) with pictures of some paint missing from spots on the upper and lower edges of the headstock and a tear in the case near the handle -

However the bass was flawless- the only flaw was the tear in the case cover-

View attachment 5313694

View attachment 5313696

View attachment 5313699

The case has that tear but that’s what a case is for- I will say that it’s quite heavy to lug around though the bass itself is light.

View attachment 5313700
That binding is sharp…really sets it off nice!
 
Some of the so called “QC” issues were complaints about the nitro finishes not being 100% perfectly smooth looking like one gets on a poly finish. A little rougher at the seems so to speak. But that’s the nature of nitro. I have five Gibson Thunderbirds. No QC complaints from me.

I know at one point Gibson guitars had a variety of QC issues such as fret ends that would bite and claw like something nasty out of Harry Potter. That's been a while, though.
 
Maybe I’m remembering the past with “Rose coloured glasses” but Gibson’s finishes in the 60’s and 70’s were better than today’s Epiphone finishes.
Well, my EB-2 isn't entirely flawless, but it's also more than 50 years old. It probably was flawless in about 1968. I haven't had my hands on a 1970s or 1980s Gibson that I can remember. The 1991 Thunderbird was pretty well battered when I got it, but the finish had held up really well considering the obvious heavy use it went through. The only nearly new Gibson I ever had is the 2015 Thunderbird, and it really is well made and about as perfectly finished as possible.
 
That binding is sharp…really sets it off nice!

It was the binding that got me!

Another cool thing was it was listed as ‘used B-stock’ but actually new with a full Gibson warranty-

Oh and the neck is phenomenal with a low and easy action.

It sounds great with a nice acoustic resonance, and though the neck pickup hearks back to that dark Gibson tone, the bridge pup is quite toppy with good articulation and makes for a good blend with the other one-

The icing on the cake was the case candy including this nifty multi-tool in addition to the requisite Allen key-

IMG_6109.jpeg