Needless to say, I didn’t spend much time outside
Home is a little better. It will only be -14 tonight![]()
Ouch!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Needless to say, I didn’t spend much time outside
Home is a little better. It will only be -14 tonight![]()
I’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.I am a big fan of EBCFs. Also Kevin Smith Rockmaster strings when I go to rounds. One of these years, I plan to set up the '91 and '01 with Rockmasters and get the pickups and action as close to the same as possible. The '91 has Thunderbucker pickups and the '01 is stock. The goal is to eliminate variables as much as possible to see if there's much difference in the sound.
1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
I’m generally ok with the three-point for most of my Thunderbirds. But I prefer the Babicz drop in replacement. Some like the Hipshot Supertone. Great company, but I’ve tried one on two Thunderbirds now and just couldn’t get the action as low as I like. I also think the Babicz looks better.I’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.
If I go with the Gibson I would get a second hand 1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
You know me..I'd talk him down to $5 if I had the wall space.Ooooh. For ten bucks, that's pretty hard to pass up.
Gotta love that svelte 7.7 weight.Cool concept. I'd be all on board for one of these.....mm
Bass of the Week: Brooks EB-TB-IV
Needless to say, I didn’t spend much time outside
Home is a little better. It will only be -14 tonight![]()
Yes - Happy B-Day Frank - Capricorns rule!![]()
In keeping with the unofficial policy in this club to continue to perpetuate negative myths and exaggerations about Tbirds in an effort to drive the desire to own one down and thereby make them more affordable so we can buy more of them - the answer is YES, the three point bridge is a horrid abomination that should never have even been invented much less used, never purchase a bass with a three point bridge!… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
HAPPY THUNDERBIRTHDAY !!!!!!Mine was on the 9th, and a just unboxed my first Thunderbird today!
Some went with G; others went with L.![]()
This takes care of the “silks on saddles”issueI’ve never tried rockmasters before… I’ll keep an eye out for them.
If I go with the Gibson I would get a second hand 1995 onwards, it’s really the only time period Gibson that goes for a price I’m willing to pay on reverb… so on that topic is the three point bridge as bad as people say it is? And if it is are there good mods for it?
My commute is ten steps from my front door to my truck. Then typically anywhere from 50 to 200 miles driving during the day, depending on where my job (or jobs) are that day. I have clients/systems I manage as far south as Pebble Beach/Monterey, and as far north/east as Truckee/Lake Tahoe. I do a good job missing a lot of the commute traffic, since I usually do get out the door until after 9, but if I am on my way back home at 5 to 6 pm, I can get hung up in it since I live very near one of the bridges that cross the SF Bay. And Thursdays are the worst. I think a substantial amount of people that live way out in the valley and beyond maybe stay in the Bay Area Monday through Wednesday night and go home after work on Thursdays. I’d guess Monday mornings coming in from the valley are terrible too.
That binding is sharp…really sets it off nice!Just unboxed this beauty, my first Thunderbird two days after my birthday-
Rather gonsmacked as it was listed B-stock (40 % off) with pictures of some paint missing from spots on the upper and lower edges of the headstock and a tear in the case near the handle -
However the bass was flawless- the only flaw was the tear in the case cover-
View attachment 5313694
View attachment 5313696
View attachment 5313699
The case has that tear but that’s what a case is for- I will say that it’s quite heavy to lug around though the bass itself is light.
View attachment 5313700
Some of the so called “QC” issues were complaints about the nitro finishes not being 100% perfectly smooth looking like one gets on a poly finish. A little rougher at the seems so to speak. But that’s the nature of nitro. I have five Gibson Thunderbirds. No QC complaints from me.
Someone must have asked him to turn down.
Well, my EB-2 isn't entirely flawless, but it's also more than 50 years old. It probably was flawless in about 1968. I haven't had my hands on a 1970s or 1980s Gibson that I can remember. The 1991 Thunderbird was pretty well battered when I got it, but the finish had held up really well considering the obvious heavy use it went through. The only nearly new Gibson I ever had is the 2015 Thunderbird, and it really is well made and about as perfectly finished as possible.Maybe I’m remembering the past with “Rose coloured glasses” but Gibson’s finishes in the 60’s and 70’s were better than today’s Epiphone finishes.
That binding is sharp…really sets it off nice!