• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Hahahaha!! Thankfully I am not dealing with those. If I were, either me or my wife would have some explaining to do.



Here is one for a good price ;)

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Uh, thanks I think. Can’t imagine bringing any more basses in for a few months. That is a good price. Seriously, someone here should give it a good home. The current market price is well under what they should be going for.
 
If you have a chance to play a Hamer Blitz, give it a shot. Mine is seriously one of my best sounding basses and plays great! I thought they looked huge but when I played one, it wasn't much different from a Thunderbird. I cannot speak for any other makes of Explorer's but if they are anything like the ergos of my Blitz, I think you would be comfortable playing one.

View attachment 3643642
View attachment 3643643
Hamer has made some beautiful basses.
 
If memory serves, each bass in manufactured in a different country...could account for something
I did not think tonewood made much difference until comparing a 2013 EB to a 2015 Thunderbird. Both are made in USA Gibsons. The EB has a maple set neck and ash or alder body. The Thunderbird is mahogany and built the way we all know and love. The pickups are the same, as are the electronics for all intents and purposes. The EB is significantly brighter and has a harder attack with more light yellow in the sound. The Thunderbird has more dark maroon in its sound. They sound similar, as you would expect, but they have very different overtones and highlights.
 
I did not think tonewood made much difference until comparing a 2013 EB to a 2015 Thunderbird. Both are made in USA Gibsons. The EB has a maple set neck and ash or alder body. The Thunderbird is mahogany and built the way we all know and love. The pickups are the same, as are the electronics for all intents and purposes. The EB is significantly brighter and has a harder attack with more light yellow in the sound. The Thunderbird has more dark maroon in its sound. They sound similar, as you would expect, but they have very different overtones and highlights.
I can't help wondering if my biggest beef with the EpiBird 5er wasn't the alder body/maple neck rather than mahogany body/neck.
 
I did not think tonewood made much difference until comparing a 2013 EB to a 2015 Thunderbird. Both are made in USA Gibsons. The EB has a maple set neck and ash or alder body. The Thunderbird is mahogany and built the way we all know and love. The pickups are the same, as are the electronics for all intents and purposes. The EB is significantly brighter and has a harder attack with more light yellow in the sound. The Thunderbird has more dark maroon in its sound. They sound similar, as you would expect, but they have very different overtones and highlights.
My experience as well. My EB13 has more punch/attack and is brighter than my 2015 TBird. Many will claim that the pickups/electronics in any given bass are the sole sound of that bass and if you move the pups to a different bass it will sound exactly like the one you took them out of regardless of the body or neck woods.

My experience is quite the opposite. Although the pups/electronics play a huge role in the sound of the bass, I find the body and even more so the neck woods do play a noticeable role in the sound of the bass. Maybe not as predictable as some would claim but still noticeable to my ears.

I can't help wondering if my biggest beef with the EpiBird 5er wasn't the alder body/maple neck rather than mahogany body/neck.
May very well be the case. My preference is Mahogany or maple body basses with Mahogany or maple necks and rosewood fretboards. But I do have one pine body bass with a maple/maple neck that sounds phenomenal, so some day I'd be interested to try that combo in a TBird shape with bird electronics. Could be interesting, might sound horrible, never know until you try.
 
Last edited:
Well, is not a Thunderbird but the puppy (4 year old Aussie, a perpetual puppy) is really enjoying the new chew toy she found in her stocking...
IMG_3680.jpg


As for me, among many nice things under the tree, I did receive a sweet little gift wrapped note from the wife - good for one bass of my choice! She asked if I was going to get another Thunderbird. It's apparently her favorite sounding bass in my collection. Can't argue with good taste.:thumbsup:
 
Well, is not a Thunderbird but the puppy (4 year old Aussie, a perpetual puppy) is really enjoying the new chew toy she found in her stocking...
View attachment 3643738

As for me, among many nice things under the tree, I did receive a sweet little gift wrapped note from the wife - good for one bass of my choice! She asked if I was going to get another Thunderbird. It's apparently her favorite sounding bass in my collection. Can't argue with good taste.:thumbsup:

now that is a great present
 
I did not think tonewood made much difference until comparing a 2013 EB to a 2015 Thunderbird. Both are made in USA Gibsons. The EB has a maple set neck and ash or alder body. The Thunderbird is mahogany and built the way we all know and love. The pickups are the same, as are the electronics for all intents and purposes. The EB is significantly brighter and has a harder attack with more light yellow in the sound. The Thunderbird has more dark maroon in its sound. They sound similar, as you would expect, but they have very different overtones and highlights.
The new Embassy's are supposed to be Mahogany. Really the only difference should be the set neck as far as I can tell. I'm a believer in wood contributing to the tone. Basswood sounds like mud to me the few times I've played a bass made out of it. But I can't tell that the set neck or neck through makes any difference. I'm sure it does, but I can't tell it. My '64 Thunderbird and the set neck '64 Epi Embassy seem to have the same sustain and are very close in tone. But the Bird does sound a very slight tad better for some reason. Maybe it's the "wings" that make the difference!
 
Well I'd say Google, but that's a search function, isn't it... LOL
I am told that links to Let Me Google That For You are disallowed by the site software. Instead (in other threads) various people with varying levels of maliciousness suggest searching. But we love to demonstrate our intelligence and idiocy by providing marginally useful answers every time they come up.*


* I may be suffering excess caffeine, insufficient stimulation, or just need to chat Thunderbirds because it is too early to start rocking because the kiddo is still sleeping.
 
Last edited:
I am told that links to Let Me Google That For You are disallowed by the site software. Instead (in other threads) various people with varying levels of maliciousness suggest searching. But we love to demonstrate our intelligence and idiocy by proving marginally useful answers every time they come up.*
I want to help, but don't have time to deal because I'm always in an anxiety-driven forward drive to some chore or job. I do steal a minute to look in here though.


*I may be suffering excess caffeine, insufficient stimulation, or just need to chat Thunderbirds because it is too early to start rocking because the kiddo is still sleeping.
That is tempting though... lol...