vicenzajay said:Let me ponder this one a bit and refresh myself with my notes...
Still waiting on my Tung-sols, so I will update it with those as well.
Have a great weekend!
Jay
Thanks man. Can't wait to hear your thoughts on it.
You too. Peace.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
vicenzajay said:Let me ponder this one a bit and refresh myself with my notes...
Still waiting on my Tung-sols, so I will update it with those as well.
Have a great weekend!
Jay
Still don't have Tung Sols, however, looking through my notes, I'm not finding a lot concerning a vintage "growl" tone. That's perhaps because I'm playing through Wizzy's - which have a vintage mid-thing going on as part of the cab's design.SnakeAnthony said:Thanks man. Can't wait to hear your thoughts on it.
You too. Peace.
vicenzajay said:Still don't have Tung Sols, however, looking through my notes, I'm not finding a lot concerning a vintage "growl" tone. That's perhaps because I'm playing through Wizzy's - which have a vintage mid-thing going on as part of the cab's design.
Coming at it from the other direction, I would list the GE and JJ tubes as not being what you're looking for (GE being very smooth and detailed and the JJ being the low-end, kick-you-in-the-you-know-what king). Perhaps the Chinese 12AX7 would fit the bill the best (from the tubes I auditioned).
I will update this when I have a few more tubes to try.
Good point about the particular instrument, which should give quite a bit of it's tone to what we're hearingSnakeAnthony said:Well, perhaps the stock may be fitting for what I want. Listening to Dave Schools using his 201 has always been awsome, with that 'growl' that I'm thinking of, but I hate the touch of steril tone his Modulus adds to it. I'll have to check one out with a bass more along my lines and see what I think.
Thanks for the time and thought though. And I will still look forward to your updates. Still and awsome shoot out. Peace, man.
vicenzajay said:Tom Bowlus - you mentioned that you were interested in the gig reports with the JJ long plate in V2. I've got to say that after 4 more shows, I'm very happy with this combination. The overall tone of the rig gets hotter and bit more "gritty" as the night wears on (and the tubes really warm up). I found that the 3rd and 4th sets for each night would require a slight adjustment of gain on the preamp and PA board. The tone itself was a perfect blend of Demeter sheen matched with a touch of "rock" tube break-up. I could really hear it with the in-ear monitors. I do, at some time, want to try the rig with a very clean V2 tube (maybe the GE again or perhaps the Tung Sol when I get it).
Gotta love the Dem 201 with the Jensen D.I. though....just what the doctor ordered for my purposes.
Jay
vicenzajay said:Good question on the HBP-1. While I don't have one near here to pop the tube into, I'd certainly be willing to send you this tube to try it out. I'm definitely in a tube rolling "mood" lately, and I have plenty of other tubes to pop in there.
vicenzajay said:I'll have a look at the lot number later and get back to you. Everything's already put back together and re-racked. The microphonic AX7 tube was an EICO by Mullard - ECC83/12AX7 (which doesn't tell me much). It's screened Great Britain, and the last two numbers of the batch number are "34". The good tube had the classic Mullard silk screen and the slightly thinner overall diameter of the vintage tube runs. The microphonic 12AU7 has a 178 batch number and the classic Mullard shield. Numbers on the back are K61 and B8G.
Jay
P.S. I think I'm done spending the time to post this stuff up here on TB. If you're not one of the "favored" few, noone (except for an isolated few) seems to read or post up on extensive review work done by someone who doesn't have 5000+ posts or enough gear to keep 25 people interested for two days. I appreciate your question, Paul (and your response, Devilman) - I'm just mystified that only two people responded...especially given the sheer number of tube preamps owned by members on this board. The one review I did that generated a decent response was the review on the budget Steelsound cab last year - go figure, it took all of about 30 minutes to get the data to write that one up. This took quite a while just to gather the tube specimens, let alone do the test, take notes, then write it up. I'll just wait until some quintuple A+ flame maple topped bass drops into my lap (I'm not a flamed maple fan BTW) - then I'll throw up some gratuitous pictures and 600 people will post about it for days. Just venting.
vicenzajay said:I got two Tung Sol tubes in from Doug's Tubes today and spent some time doing some A/B work with the setup I have now and the Tung Sol's.
Don't have time to post all of it up tonight - but right now I've settled on a balanced Tung Sol in V1 and a JAN GE 12AX7A in the V2 slot. Of interest - I actually did some rolling in V2 and found that the position actually does have a very noticeable contribution to overall tone.
The Tung Sol is very balanced up and down the frequency spectrum....no "vintageness" to it all (at least in my Demeter). I found that, in comparison, the Mullard actually has a vintage bump in it's frequency response.
The Mullard still has the sweetest highs in V1, but if I used the Tung Sol together with the Mullard - WHOA nelly - TOO much high end response by far. At that point I started auditioning some very clean tubes in V2. More to follow on this later, but I decided on the GE as it really sweetened up the high frequency response yet let the Tung Sol do the incredibly clear thing it does down low.
Bottom line is that the Tung Sol offerings are pretty nice - especially if you like a modern, clean tone.
Not on topic, but related - I just have to say again just how much I love the Demeter 201....with all these combinations, this preamp just dishes out some sweet, sweet tone - quick yet liquid.
Take care,
Jay
P.S. I think I'm done spending the time to post this stuff up here on TB. If you're not one of the "favored" few, noone (except for an isolated few) seems to read or post up on extensive review work done by someone who doesn't have 5000+ posts or enough gear to keep 25 people interested for two days. I appreciate your question, Paul (and your response, Devilman) - I'm just mystified that only two people responded...especially given the sheer number of tube preamps owned by members on this board. The one review I did that generated a decent response was the review on the budget Steelsound cab last year - go figure, it took all of about 30 minutes to get the data to write that one up. This took quite a while just to gather the tube specimens, let alone do the test, take notes, then write it up. I'll just wait until some quintuple A+ flame maple topped bass drops into my lap (I'm not a flamed maple fan BTW) - then I'll throw up some gratuitous pictures and 600 people will post about it for days. Just venting.
hey i was just reading this today... Hey jay... I just bought a Jan Philips 12ax7wa for the v1 spot and am going to leave the stock EH in the v2 spot. What do you think? oh yeah...its for my deme vbt 201s
CB
Jay, I do not have a Demeter pre-amp but I found your review a nice piece of work. I appreciate your efforts on our behalf. I still do build tube amplifiers but only for guitar players and no longer for bass. I have standardized on Sovtek tubes for my designs simply because I find them a good consistant brand at a reasonable price. If one of my clients wants a specific brand of tube then I will supply that brand.
Thanks for all your hard work
Paul
I love JAN Philips tubes...especially the lower gain (12AT7/5751) varieties....how does it sound? I'm thinking that combination is going to sound sweet. One suggestion - try swapping out the V2 and V1 here...put the EH in V1 and the Philips in V2. You might be surprised![]()
Jay