• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

So, which set of knobs looks better on my new Peavey?
1.5 fury.jpg
1 fury.jpg
I'm a bit torn on which ones to use. Thanks for your opinions.
 
The Strat knobs look wrong and cheap.
The Les Paul knobs look wrong and not cheap.
I know Peavey used a speed knob with the rubber band but they will always look like Les Paul knobs to me.
I like to put on knurled metal knobs, either flat top or dome top, sometimes silver sometimes black.
What that red bass needs is a pickguard other than a one ply white.
Black/White/Black three ply.
Cream/Black/Cream three ply.
Red Pearl.
Black Pearl.
 
Last edited:
The Strat knobs look wrong and cheap.
The Les Paul knobs look wrong and not cheap.
I know Peavey used a speed knob with the rubber band but they will always look like Les Paul knobs to me.
I like to put on knurled metal knobs, either flat top or dome top, sometimes silver sometimes black.
What that red bass needs is a pickguard other than a one ply white.
Black/White/Black three ply.
Cream/Black/Cream three ply.
Red Pearl.
Black Pearl.
I agree on the knobs and guard: plastic knobs and the 1-ply white looks kinda budget.
Chrome knobs to match the hardware and a 3-ply guard in B/W/B or Parchment/B/P would look nice.
I did a 1-ply matte black guard and 80s metal "P" knobs on my 94 green Forum Plus (same era as your Fury). It looks much better than the original W/B/W guard and black speed knobs. I may put regular chrome knurls on there to look more 90s Peavey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowboy in Latvia
Just ordered another foundation on a whim from gc. Anyone have more info on the year? Ive never seen a headstock like that.
Same as my 1991 Peavey Dyna Bass..the pointy edged earlier headstock shape has been "softened". My 1979 Peavey T-40 has the usual "pointy" shape that is most recognized.

1991 Peavey Dyna Bass "softened shape" headstock
LUCY07.JPG


Peavey 1979 T-40 Older Style 'Pointy" headstock shape
PEAVEYT40 3.JPG
 
I've got a line on an early 90's Rudy Sarzo bass in excellent condition but, unlike many US Peavey models, I really don't have a good feel for the value of one of these—versus, say, a TL-5. Do you folks have any relevant experience with this signature instrument? Is it worth a hard look and significant dollars? If so, how much value is reasonable in today's market? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
@jmlee
Do you have a chance to play it before buying?
My own Sarzo says in the rack. Great looking/feelin bass but I've never got a tone I could use. Last weekend when another Peavey player cam visiting I got her to try it.

Her opinion and I quote.

" plays great but it's got no balls!"

That is my thought too.,probably worked for the M TV-friendly 80's metal Sarzo played. The last few for sale in Europe all have had pickup /preamp swaps. Guess the nasal tone aint popular here.
I'm sure spendin time/money with strings/EQ pedals and preamps I might tame the highs but it's a damn sight easier and cheaper just to play a bass that works right off the bat. Overpriced and overrated IMHO.
 
Funny how memory works. After reading these posts about Sarzos, I remember now why I sold mine... it never got the nod over my other basses, when it came to sound. I only miss it for the aesthetics and the memory of seeing one in a glass case at Broadway Sound in Knoxville, when it was well above my budget. And, the pleasure of being able to have one later on, after I had a career and decent income. I didn’t play it first, never played one actually, before buying it online. Craftsmanship was top of the heap, and truly gorgeous woods and hardware. Now, if I had one, I’d probably stick T-40 pickups in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kodiakblair

Latest posts