• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

You have an El Toro???? That's my unicorn bass! As for narrow string spacing, my L5000 easily has the narrowest spacing for a fiver.
Oh yeah! Got lucky with this one. I was looking for a black, early/mid 80s L2000. An ad on C'sList popped up about 5 years ago titled "G&L L2000, Black" No real description other than "with original case, good condition" and 3 very blurry photos--like taken with a 2003 camera phone. I could make out the dual rows of pole pieces, red and white switch tips and black hammer finished bridge--which all checked out with the era of G&L I sought.
When we met up, he mentioned he bought it new in 1984 (it dates from July of 1983). He popped open the case and there it was, clear as day, "EL Toro" on the headstock. (How the heck did he miss that and call it an L2000?) I kept my cool, tested to make sure everything worked OK, gave him the reasonable L2000 price he was asking and scooted home. It does have an ever-so-slight ski jump and there is some finish damage on the headstock, but neither thing has a negative effect on the bass and it's playability.
They are killer. I love the neck profile and tone. It's 2 parts L2000, 1 part J bass and comes stock with all the tricks already on board. Perfect.
Stock, it was overly bright in active mode, but a simple, single resistor mod (suggested directly from Paul Gagon-the designer of the preamp) resulted in the active and passive modes having a similar top end.
enhance.jpg

I'm not surprised the L5000 has narrow spacing. Seems many of the early 5 string models were pretty narrowly spaced. I played a 1986 Ibanez RB885 and it was pretty narrow, too.
 
Oh yeah! Got lucky with this one. I was looking for a black, early/mid 80s L2000. An ad on C'sList popped up about 5 years ago titled "G&L L2000, Black" No real description other than "with original case, good condition" and 3 very blurry photos--like taken with a 2003 camera phone. I could make out the dual rows of pole pieces, red and white switch tips and black hammer finished bridge--which all checked out with the era of G&L I sought.
When we met up, he mentioned he bought it new in 1984 (it dates from July of 1983). He popped open the case and there it was, clear as day, "EL Toro" on the headstock. (How the heck did he miss that and call it an L2000?) I kept my cool, tested to make sure everything worked OK, gave him the reasonable L2000 price he was asking and scooted home. It does have an ever-so-slight ski jump and there is some finish damage on the headstock, but neither thing has a negative effect on the bass and it's playability.
They are killer. I love the neck profile and tone. It's 2 parts L2000, 1 part J bass and comes stock with all the tricks already on board. Perfect.
Stock, it was overly bright in active mode, but a simple, single resistor mod (suggested directly from Paul Gagon-the designer of the preamp) resulted in the active and passive modes having a similar top end.
View attachment 3683554
I'm not surprised the L5000 has narrow spacing. Seems many of the early 5 string models were pretty narrowly spaced. I played a 1986 Ibanez RB885 and it was pretty narrow, too.

That is awesome. Good story too. I have an 82 L2KE. Was a mess when I got it, had a number of undisclosed problems. Neck was the worst part including a major ski jump that made it unplayable beyond the 14th fret. I ended up sending the neck to that guy in Texas and had him heat treat the neck and it straightened out nearly completely. That's been nearly 4 years ago and it's still holding. It was my number one until the last year or so. I just wish it didn't weigh nearly 11lbs. You feel it the next day after a 4 hour gig.
 
I'm not sure the difference, but this one is three ply (black/white/black).
The body shape changed on the Fury basses, and the pickguard changed along with the body.
This white Fury is a Gen 3 like yours and the black pickguard has a curve to it below the pickup.
The cream Fury is also Gen 3, same curve below the pickup.
The blue one is a Gen 2 and has a wider body and the shape is different from yours, the pickguard is more of a straight line under the pickup.
IMG_20180328_173421_114 (1).jpg
DSCN2180 (1).jpg
DSCN2156 (1).jpg
 
Last edited:
The body shape changed on the Fury basses, and the pickguard changed along with the body.
This white Fury is a Gen 3 like yours and the black pickguard has a curve to it below the pickup.
The cream Fury is also Gen 3, same curve below the pickup.
The blue one is a Gen 2 and has a wider body and the shape is different from yours, the pickguard is more of a straight line under the pickup.View attachment 3683889 View attachment 3683891 View attachment 3683893
Thanks for the info. It does have the Gen 2 pickguard then. I know from the serial number it is 1992 and the headstock has script writing, but no border black line around the headstock. Is it possibly that one some Gen 3 bodies they would put a Gen 2 pickguard for a while? I would think the bottom two holes (under the pickup) are different on each pickguard. This one only has the correct holes for the Gen 2.
 
Friday I discovered a really good looking Palaedium in Facebook marketplace. I immediately set a message to the guy that listed it. He got back to me yesterday and said the bass was in a store in Waco and he listed it for the owner. I called this morning and it is already sold. Oh well, I already have a nice one but the other one had a highly figured neck. LOL

It was not meant to be.
 
Friday I discovered a really good looking Palaedium in Facebook marketplace. I immediately set a message to the guy that listed it. He got back to me yesterday and said the bass was in a store in Waco and he listed it for the owner. I called this morning and it is already sold. Oh well, I already have a nice one but the other one had a highly figured neck. LOL

It was not meant to be.

Bummer!