Why, because they didn't do a recall on the basses, and offer to come to your home to swap out the pickups, and give you a manicure while you wait?I agree with your points. Mistakes happen, but it's how those mistakes are recognized and handled that matters. Fender/Gretsch have handled this very poorly.
I see no evidence that Fender acted substantially differently than any other company that makes this type of mistake. Every company has aggrieved customers... even, dare I say it?!? Thomann and Harley Benton.
As to the claims of "poor treatment," you've got one guy haranguing the repair department in the earliest months of the pandemic; and... an email from Gretsch acknowledging the error and offering affected customers some swag. They didn't deny it, they didn't attack you, they just said "sorry, we'll fix it."
I'd add that you're going to continue to accuse them of fraud, no matter what remedies they offered. So, I'm going to take your evaluation of their response with a gigantic grain of salt, kthx.
There is abundant evidence of a manufacturing mistake. There is zero evidence of fraud. None, nada, bupkis.Folks saying that we're supposed to expect stuff like this for the price are flat out wrong. This is why consumer protection laws exist....
The difference in the cost of the parts is negligible.
They aren't doing this on dozens of models.
You don't have emails sent by Fender execs proving this was a deliberate choice.
You don't have a video of Fred Gretsch laughing maniacally by getting an extra $5 on every G2220 sold.
This kind of thing happens all the time.
You just went straight to assuming bad intentions. See above re: Grain of salt.
By the way, I work in technology. Companies ship constantly ship products and software that are riddled with bugs, can go unfixed for years, and can't be fixed by customers. (In some cases, those companies actively fight against the right to repair broken products.) Some software companies know about major security flaws for months (or years) and don't do anything about them. Thus, while the product certainly should match the spec sheet, all the hyperbole and hysterics over this strikes me as almost amusingly absurd. (I'm guessing that that one reason why this conversation got so heated is because the stakes are so low.)
I also can't think of another instrument where almost no one cared about the pickup type for so long. Can you?I can't think of another bass that was produced for so long and misrepresented in such a way.
I'm not criticizing being vocal. I didn't say "suck it up." I never said that "no one should point out the problem."It's important for us as consumers to be vocal about issues like this because that's the only way change will happen.
Rather, previously I pointed out that no reasonable person should have outlandish expectations of the quality of cheap instruments; that every company makes mistakes; and that brand is irrelevant to that calculation.
Further, in this post, I'm pointing out that if you're going to accuse someone of actual fraud, you need a little more than an apparent manufacturing mistake in one model out of literally hundreds of instruments.
