Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
New track on my fretless Wal Pro, out of the three Wals I own this is one of my favorites, No EQ necessary, no knob fiddling
I’m a fan. Beautiful.
I may be open to 4 string Wals in trade on this magnificent beast below.
I play fretless or fretted. A fretless 5er? Maybe I miss Leo’s old fretless 5 which was my first Wal ever.
I’m an off brand guy and could be hip to another trade.
Got a Fodera AJ Presentation sitting under your bed?
Don’t reply to the Wal Club thread if you have a trade to discuss, contact me via PM / DM.
I play fretless or fretted. A fretless 5er? Maybe I miss Leo’s old fretless 5 which was my first Wal ever.
I’m an off brand guy and could be hip to another trade.
Got a Fodera AJ Presentation sitting under your bed?
Don’t reply to the Wal Club thread if you have a trade to discuss, contact me via PM / DM.
Does anyone have the contact info for the machinist who makes Wal-ish knobs?
New track on my fretless Wal Pro, out of the three Wals I own this is one of my favorites, No EQ necessary, no knob fiddling
Excellent playing! Great tone. What gauge strings? They look really light.
Thanks, I have this one in tenor tuning ADGC Daddario strings 80 65 45 30. But for this track I tune to FCFC with the same strings. I use other open tunings as well.
Last edited:
Here are some better pictures of my Mk2 :
I have also received the Schaller light tuners that I still need to put on.
I will report what the weight saving is.
I have also received the Schaller light tuners that I still need to put on.
I will report what the weight saving is.
I have a couple of Mark 1 questions- perhaps someone can answer
1. The upper horn aligns with the 14th fret which is not typical these days. I realize the bass is smaller than Fender's offerings- due to its smaller body size, does the bass have balance issues? Perhaps the smaller body needed the 14th fret upper horn for balance?
2. I have heard that the painted versions do not have a mahogany core- can anyone confirm that and if so, what wood was used and is it non veneered?
1. The upper horn aligns with the 14th fret which is not typical these days. I realize the bass is smaller than Fender's offerings- due to its smaller body size, does the bass have balance issues? Perhaps the smaller body needed the 14th fret upper horn for balance?
2. I have heard that the painted versions do not have a mahogany core- can anyone confirm that and if so, what wood was used and is it non veneered?
Balance is pretty similar to Fender on the Mk1s that I've owned. The 2x2 headstock helps a bit, but my recollection is that the heavier ones balanced a little better than the lighter ones. I expect that the newer lightweight tuners probably balance better then the older Schallers.
Painted versions used to use solid mahogany core with no facings by default.
Painted versions used to use solid mahogany core with no facings by default.
Was about to say exactly this… never had any balance issues with my Mk 1 or my Pro. Stays put when I lift my hand off the neck. Wide, suede backed leather strap helps too.
Well that then makes me wonder how a MarkII can also be well balance with its 12th fret upper horn- is the MarkII body larger , therefore heavier?
The only thing short is the horns. side by side; across the body width is the nearly same as my P.
Its a design from the 70's with their original bass, which was a Gibson style influence on the horns.
The Mk2 is a tiny bit wider, its exactly the same width as my StingRay.
Weight would boil down to wood selection. I've had Mk2's that were lighter than Mk1's. But the possibility is definitely there for a Mk2 to be heavier if you had two made from the same batch of timbers.
But also the neck on a Mk2 is tucked into the body further, so the headstock doesn't stick out as far away as a Mk1. They mount the bridge closer to the edge of the body to achieve that. You can see how a Mk1 bridge location has more of a 'porch' around it.
Its a design from the 70's with their original bass, which was a Gibson style influence on the horns.
The Mk2 is a tiny bit wider, its exactly the same width as my StingRay.
Weight would boil down to wood selection. I've had Mk2's that were lighter than Mk1's. But the possibility is definitely there for a Mk2 to be heavier if you had two made from the same batch of timbers.
But also the neck on a Mk2 is tucked into the body further, so the headstock doesn't stick out as far away as a Mk1. They mount the bridge closer to the edge of the body to achieve that. You can see how a Mk1 bridge location has more of a 'porch' around it.
Last edited:
I agree, but I also own it.
I haven’t saw an Asian Ebony fretboard quite like this one on another Wal.
I like the figuring making it different than jet black Ebony.
It’s interesting reading up on woods.
I’m a tone wood junkie. Wals are significantly electronics based but still there are minor idiosyncrasies in every bass I’ve experienced that can only be explained by mother nature’s contribution to the instrument, which is of course wood. To each their own.
Questions for the Wal Club:
Has anyone requested or been offered some unique facings from Paul recently?
Has an official list of commonly available and discontinued facings ever been made? Probably forever ago?
Shedua went from stock to custom I think?
I’ve chosen the craziest walnut facing offered on my incoming MK2. It’s not as wild as the Zebrano though.
I’ll put up a pic when I get it.
I’ve chosen the craziest walnut facing offered on my incoming MK2. It’s not as wild as the Zebrano though.
I’ll put up a pic when I get it.
My Mk1’s bottom bout was wider than my ‘75 Precision, maybe not far off my ‘78 StingRay.
