I've never heard someone what actually had a formal musical education say that it held them back. Ironically, it's the ones without a formal musical education, that don't know what they don't know, that think somehow knowledge holds you back.Not true... Every art form has that idea, (ever heard of the Primitive or Outsider Movement?) and it's valid as far as stylistic programming goes. Writers made an effort to abandon style conventions many times, or else we'd still be using Thomas Hardy's style. Vonnegut walked away from all that school technique, invented new conventions still in use. For instance, limiting the vocabulary. (look where we are now with that...)
Being boring is the only crime in fine art, and if you use every color you still might make boring art. Throw it out and start again fresh.
Sometimes it is necessary to get away from programmed methods and just wander in the wilderness. People who come up with melody after melody know this. It can't be taught, but mind/technique chatter can prevent many experiences. Schools of pedagogy Do dictate styles. Great visual art schools Teach how to go beyond those. Classical music schools didn't used too, as the audiences leaving Beethoven and Stravinsky concerts demonstrate. Now they have Cage to electronic so called music, and making a living is what is taught. You can make a living teaching a pedagogical method and conventions of style. R&R is taught in summer camps now which is a damn good idea. PS I believe Chet Baker had some issues with reading and didn't know chordal harmony with the, um, verbal part of his brain. It wasn't a problem, but he wasn't an innovator, he was an American phenom idiot savant.
An education allows you the choice of following the path or striking out on your own.
Creative people find creative ways to use the tools at their disposal. Uncreative people find excuses for why they can't be creative.


