It's a nice variation, but like the dude said, you must craft yer buzz ...
That was the dude, right?
Who's asking?
That was the dude, right?
Who's asking?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I understand your points. I wasn't trying to equate playing music or other benign activities with potentially hazardous things like driving, using heavy equipment/machinery or interpreting Sanskrit, lol. My point is, impairment is impairment (reduced function), no matter what you're doing. I know some think drugs and/or alcohol (alcohol is a drug too) enhance their abilities but as a lot of people here have stated, they are usually worse. For me, giving up on impairment years ago, has been awesome!i appreciate your point of view. luckily, playing the bass guitar (subjective, situational and artistic) does not come with the same risk/responsibility as driving a vehicle. the point i am trying to make it that some people find that taking certain substances actually enhances their ability to play music, for the style/skill-level that suits their fancy. And others report physical and psychological challenges when taking certain substances, which can impair their ability to perform at the style/skill-level that suits their fancy. it's not our job to determine what works for others, especially if people can enjoy those substances in a legal and safe setting. And, from most of the responses on this thread, it seems that folks are able to self-regulate and understand their personal preferences.
Personally, i'd be significantly more impaired on stage by a pre-show chili dog than a toke or two form a doobie... it's all relative...
caffeine is a drug, so is Adderall and nicotine and those are all drugs that improve performance. I've never smoked cigs but i have taken Adderall twice in my life and only at super late night gigs and holy hell did I play. I felt really cracked out afterwards and didn't eat for 2 days on each occasion so that's a no from me dawgNobody plays better high. I am sure many think they play better high. Most play worse. I know a few guys who keep a slight buzz going and they are fine. There are many more who take that extra hit and their timing and playing goes bye bye.
I suppose medically speaking meth and coke would be best. Then there is all that inconvenient death from stroke and a heart attack thing but who am I to judge. Caffeine for me thanks.
Here's the difference between weed and booze: after over 200,000 years of on and off use we have built in canaboid receptors in our brain cells and that's the avenue weed uses to effect you. Alcohol that came by accident with learning how to store grains in a hole in the ground 10,000 years ago, poisonously blocks oxygen from getting to your brain cells, so you are killing brain cells to get 'er done
I don't believe I said it was. That's up to others to decide.
And those they play with and for to decide if they find it acceptable.
Never met a musician who was a better musician for drinking or toking up. Although I’ve met many who thought they were.![]()





I've played the guitar and recorded it on an tape recorder while using pot in college. I thought it sounded really good until I played it back...it sucked!If you use weed does it effect your bass playing in a positive or negative way?
For me it really helps when I am learning theory and practicing scales arpeggios etc. I am more into it and feel more aware of what is happening. But playing cover songs for some reason it messes me up. I forget certain parts, loose focus and generally do not play as good.
Just wondering how it effects you?
Do you have any actual genuine scientific (as in: juried neurological, biological, or anthropological) research to back that up?
Because beyond the best estimates that Homo Sapiens first started appearing about 200,000 years ago, none of your argument is anything I’ve ever read anywhere.
BTW, alcohol doesn’t “kill brain cells.” It impairs the chemical signals between neurons resulting in the commonly observed symptoms of intoxication. Long term excess can also chemically damage the dendrites of neurons thereby resulting in chronic alcohol related medical conditions.![]()
Depends on the quality of your unimpaired life.No one likes to hear it but unimpaired life is the best life.
X2. Thought I was groovin' til I noticed the other members giving each other side glances. Timing was my issue.I'm just plain bad on any drug, be it alcohol or whatever. I "think" that I sound fabulous when I'm high, but on playback when I'm sober it is glaringly obvious that I was in fact NOT.
Some folks can play while high & sound great, but it's because they're really good players with great muscle-memory.
I understand your points. I wasn't trying to equate playing music or other benign activities with potentially hazardous things like driving, using heavy equipment/machinery or interpreting Sanskrit, lol. My point is, impairment is impairment (reduced function), no matter what you're doing. I know some think drugs and/or alcohol (alcohol is a drug too) enhance their abilities but as a lot of people here have stated, they are usually worse. For me, giving up on impairment years ago, has been awesome!
Generally, if your unimpaired life is bad, your impaired life will be worse. Think about it. If one needs drugs and/or alcohol to make their life good, I'd say they have a problem.Depends on the quality of your unimpaired life.