• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What do you like more? Rackmount or pedal tuner?

I used to have a rack mount - hated it.. sucked rack space.. really didn't accomplish much... sold it.

I put a drawer in the rack mount tuner's place.. I have a peterson strobe in there for accuracy...

I also own a seiko.. small korg... cheap fender.

All of them work as long as they don't have an analog vu meter.
 
While I think that no other piece of gear is as technically misunderstood and comprehensively overestimated as the electronic tuner (witness some comments in this thread), I'm still going to go for the rack tuner for two reasons only:

1: It's easier to see.

2: It's harder to trip over.

"Accuracy" (more precisely, "the illusion of accuracy") is trivial compared to these two considerations.
 
I used rack mounts for a long time... only recently switching to a Boss TU .. and I prefer a stompbox now.

Having a Mute on the board without taking up a loop space is nice.
Not having to turn around and walk back to the amp to tune is nice.
 
"Accuracy" (more precisely said:
an interesting perspective to say the least, but i'm sure it's one that my bandmates would hate if i adopted :crying:

with that said, why intonate or tune at all ?

all of the players i know, when tuning is concerned, tuning by ear is NOT good enough, & cheap tuners with very loose tolerances are also not good enough

but hey, if it works for you, rock on brother :bassist: