TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No fair. neither sound like a J.
# 1 was defintely a P sound UNTIL I heard #2. No fair, they're EQ to sound alike, but I can hear the J better harmonics ( string resonance) and presence. 1 is J.
Its not "clunky" to me rarisgod, but I think what you're describing is what the bridge pup adds to the low notes - clarity and harmonics. I like reverse P for that.
They are not EQd to sound alike. Both have vol and tone all the way up going through a flat Presonus Eureka pre, with the exact same settings for both (being that it is flat, same gain).
I recorded a bass, took the cable from it, opened a new channel and recorded the other.
No levels were adjusted, so any difference in volume is from each bass.
Bingo.
Another point is to prove that pickup placement (location) plays a much bigger role into the sound than pickup type.
The P is an Alleva-Coppolo, said by many to match the 60s Jazz bass.
The J is a Pensa Jazz with Fralin pickups.
So it has a vintage style passive pickup, correct? (And I think you meant to say it matches a 60s Precision bass.)
.
