bongomania
Commercial User
False. I was saying that there really is such a thing as greater or lesser quality in a wide range of aspects, and that having the quality of "popularity" is not at all the same as having the quality of good musicianship. Continuing with my white bread analogy, everyone is free to be their own arbiter as to whether white bread is "good"; but it is the right and possibly even responsibility of those who are more educated about nutrition and fine baking to point out the ways in which white bread is not good for you. And that if someone sarcastically argues "I guess white bread must be terrible, after all it only sells millions and millions of loaves a day", that that is not a sensible or logical way to refute educated claims about nutrition.The point you're making is that you're the arbiter of what's good.
More money doesn't guarantee quality, it can be had for less money. It also doesn't guarantee that someone will prefer it over something that cost less money.
Obviously, but again that has exactly nothing to do, on one side or the other, with what I was saying. Nothing.
You have this weird "quality" equation that I'm guessing you'd like others to buy into. The "masses" buy what they want and unless something is good enough for them to buy it, they typically don't. The idea that they "deserve" better music (according to you) than what they like is... well, what would you call it?
![]()
White bread.
