Wish that could be brought out from the KG into the practical world.
Big +1 on that, my friend!!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Wish that could be brought out from the KG into the practical world.
no matter how much you work out and lift weights
it still wont stop the truck driver in the 18 wheeler behind you, who's been eating hamburgers his whole life, from having a heart attack and crashing into you
then write it out. i have seen it printed out in bass player mag a long time ago, but it's been a couple decades.I have yet to see the bass lines for rock or pop songs written out in musical notation. Tabs on the other hand are easy to find. It would be nice if something like Paul Simon's solo in "You Can Call Me Al" were written out.
no matter how much you work out and lift weights
it still wont stop the truck driver in the 18 wheeler behind you, who's been eating hamburgers his whole life, from having a heart attack and crashing into you
then write it out. i have seen it printed out in bass player mag a long time ago, but it's been a couple decades.
folks, if learning to read music doesn't fit into your plans, that's fine. i don't think any less of anyone who takes it less seriously than me. but it will really open your eyes to a way of playing music that you aren't experiencing now and it just might help you enjoy it more. that is a fact. and if you want that, it's there for anyone to check out. but if you're happy as it is, then may you have a great time doing your thing, but i can't recommend you as a sub on my oldies gigs![]()
sounds to me like you may not get what "sight reading" is. apologies if you do get it, but sight reading is reading a sheet of music for the first time, and is not the act of reading music in general. a lot of folks who know how to read music can't sight read. i suspect dave brubeck knows where the notes are on the page, but just may not have good reading chops and doesn't need it because he's dave brubeck.Seems to me (though I haven't read all of the posts) folks are missing an important distinction. One can understand all the theory of music and notation, and even write great music and still not be able to sight read. For example, Dave Bruebeck has written and scored amazing pieces of music but admits he can't sight read. He got through Music Conservetory till they discovered in his last year that he couldn't read. He thoroughly understands the structure and theory, he just managed to do what he wanted to do without "reading."
I really don't feel like waiting till everyone in the band has memorized the stuff.
Just wanna know why a lot of players wont learn to read. Expecialy after playing for several years. Any thoughts?
Learned how to sight read back in school orchestra/band on flute. But the school never really touched any theory, so I never learned about chords, keys, modes, etc.
Now that I'm learning bass, and mostly jazz with some rock - using a lot of chord charts - I've HAD to learn theory. Still aspects of it I'm having problems wrapping my brain around, and it takes a while sometimes to work out stuff. Plus, on flute there's only one fingering for each note - not true for bass, and I'm still - even after two years - not always sure where each note I'm reading is on the neck; and working out the best / easiest left hand fingering / fretting for my hands takes a while. Heck, I have to work around a few times with tab to be able to figure out the best fingers to put on which fret at times! So I'm certainly not good enough to be a session player of any stripe. (Nor is there much call for that sort of work in this area.) I'm getting to the point where I can play with a band, at least. But, for me, I've decided to keep on learning music reading & theory because I suspect that in the long run it'll make me a better bass player. Obviously, YMMV...
But if I could buy a new left hand and resume gigging, I'd almost certainly try to pick reading back up again. LS
you and I, my friend, tend to have rather strong opinions, wouldn't you say
![]()
I think the readers are rather snobbish to the non-readers. I think the SVT players are to the SS players. I think the Jazz guys are to the metal guys. But when someone points out McCartney or Gene Simmons or Nikki Sixx, or someone else who's done fantastic in spite of the snobbish requirements, then the argument turns to how the poster is superior to the critic. The original post is "why can't/doesn't every bassist read music?". That got carried into an attack that those who do NOT are lazy, missing out, etc, etc. I would again point out that Macca, Gene, and Sixx, are pretty darn far from what I would consider "lazy". I've said before that I am a writer, not a cover guy, and by choice. I just don't want or NEED to sightread. I started it years ago when I began taking lessons. Didn't enjoy it. Wasn't FUN for me. I can learn by ear, so it's not something I plan to do. No need to say everyone is lazy or can't that doesn't.
I'm not calling all readers "snobs". Not at all. But telling other players that they are less than YOURSELF is pure SNOBBERY. I guess it must suck for you if you spent an inordinate amount of time learning something and someone who doesn't do it can play as well, or succeeds where you don't. I can see that.
I think it is exactly the opposite.
Not hating on reading. It's like the metal threads. Lots of assumptions as to why some of us won't read and actually enjoy being "metal" and "intelligent" at the same time.
