Lots of reasons to be skeptical based on psychological aspects, but I question your definition of experts.![]()
That's why I put it in quotes and actually didn't define it
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Lots of reasons to be skeptical based on psychological aspects, but I question your definition of experts.![]()
An "expert" will never say things like post a clip and I'll tell you if it's tube or not.
I don't think is is much to be learned about playing through an amp by listening to a sound clip. That's why I don't shop for gear listening to clips. I would ask you to let me play through the amp with one of my bands and let me tell you whether or not I like it. 
I don't have a tube amp but I have a tube pre-amp if that counts. I like it because it adds warmth to my sound. I've been tempted to try something like a sansamp with "tube emulation" or what not, but I dunno, there's just something about those glowing tubes...
Because people will pay money for that. Like you said no one wants to pay for SS simulation. Same principal that gives us diet cookies, we buy what we want to believe.And just because its worth saying; If there wasnt a sonic difference between tubes and SS amps, why are there so many companies that make a SS piece of gear with "tube emulation" or something along those lines?
Because people will pay money for that. Like you said no one wants to pay for SS simulation. Same principal that gives us diet cookies, we buy what we want to believe.
In my opinion if you can't tell by listening only there's a chance you may not be able to tell the difference.
Here's one possible scenario. A company finds out people like the idea of tubes since their heros use them, they research what the perception of tubes is. Then they design a SS amp that meets that perception and slap a tube in the preamp and then say the tube makes it sound that way.
Because people will pay money for that. Like you said no one wants to pay for SS simulation. Same principal that gives us diet cookies, we buy what we want to believe.
In my opinion if you can't tell by listening only there's a chance you may not be able to tell the difference.
Here's one possible scenario. A company finds out people like the idea of tubes since their heros use them, they research what the perception of tubes is. Then they design a SS amp that meets that perception and slap a tube in the preamp and then say the tube makes it sound that way.
They just sound better. End of story. You can go on about specs all day and night, but at the end of the day, people are willing to haul them around, even though they are heavier, more complex, often more expensive, and an out of date technology. The sound rules above all else.
It doesn't need to be explained (all though I like to try), it's just a simple fact that some things give more pleasure than others. Hot tubes are one of those things.
What's it to you? I don't care what anyone else uses or whether I can tell what amp they use. -I- can tell.Because people will pay money for that. Like you said no one wants to pay for SS simulation. Same principal that gives us diet cookies, we buy what we want to believe.
In my opinion if you can't tell by listening only there's a chance you may not be able to tell the difference.
Please keep in mind that I am the least technical person on this forum. With that in mind, my reply to your question is, because the clean tube sound is different and sounds better (to me) than the clean SS amp. BTW, I am aware that 'distortion' has a different definition in engineering terms. But my reference to 'clean' and 'distorted' is in a layman's commonly used version.
Interesting article, Corey. Read like a school paper, but had some interesting info.
BBE, wouldn't the boosting of odd order harmonics in SS amps also a form of distortion? If not, why not? Would these even order harmonics also be present in a SS amp that sounds tubey, such as the LMII? Or is it not possible?
That confuses me, too. I usually don't care for SS amps near as much as tube, but that LMII is a major exception. Despite Fdeck goofing on me about my test, most people could tell the SWR from the LMII and B-15. Not so much with the LMII.
I use old Ampegs for everything - clean and dirty sounds, but the discussion here is about linear amplification. I think old Ampegs have heavy coloration on the signal even in what is perceived as the clean range of volume. I think this thread is basically asking why do we like that coloration? It is more or less some harmonic distortion of the input signal. And that is why I use them!
My question to some of you people is, when you first play a tube amp or compare it to a SS counterpart, isn't it possible that you just think it sounds better in the ways you've described, because that's what you've been told, and expect, a tube amp would do? Surely there has to be a large psychological aspect to this tube vs SS argument