+1O
At the end of the day, just play well. I've been the guy with the cool bass who sounded poopy. It's more fun to be the great player on a beat up bass. I'll settle for being a decent player with a decent bass.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
+1O
At the end of the day, just play well. I've been the guy with the cool bass who sounded poopy. It's more fun to be the great player on a beat up bass. I'll settle for being a decent player with a decent bass.
Whether it is good or bad, I think they named it Bass Mods because theyCool instruments but stupid name.
Yeah, I want bass fanatics to build mine, not any of those moderate types!Cool instruments but stupid name.
Always thought Tune's "Bass Maniac" was a great name.Whether it is good or bad, I think they named it Bass Mods because they
use to offer a lot of mod options (pickups, preamps, etc......).
Yeah, I want bass fanatics to build mine, not any of those moderate types!Always thought Tune's "Bass Maniac" was a great name.
The reason I say the name is stupid is because it sounds like a generic term. "Bass mods" are what I do when I tinker around with my instruments and different parts.
You have the right to your opinion and that's cool!The reason I say the name is stupid is because it sounds like a generic term. "Bass mods" are what I do when I tinker around with my instruments and different parts.
Oh, certainly. They are very nice.You have the right to your opinion and that's cool!
Regardless of the name, I would not be opposed to owning one!![]()

I just picked up the BassMods fretless K6 from NDthorpe in a trade. Came in yesterday and have not had a ton of time to play it. But, I have to say that i am really impressed.
Fit and finish are excellent. Neck is very nice. Ebony fretboard is very well done. The hardware is all top notch hip shot (I would suspect licensed) with Kent Armstrong pups. And while I assume that this is 100% machine made. It really does not have that awful assembly line look and feel to it. It has the character of being made by competent people.
I will need to dial it in to me a bit. But, plays really well. Sounds very "barky" vintage jazz-ish imo.
The elephant in the room on this that everybody seems to acknowledge is the weight.
Seriously, this thing weighs as much as an elephant. You don't realize what everybody is talking and you downplay or brush off the comments about that until you actually pick the thing up. And then it the reality of it hits you.
I wonder why if they did any sort of lightening/ chambering to cut down the weight. It seems like it would be easy to do, not cost much and make these quite a bit more attractive.
But the question I have for all of you is. Is this just a Cort with a Bass Mods name? If so, I will definitely be looking at other Cort variants (like the Hatsun Tune).
I am that impressed.
Thanks!
I'm no engineer, but my guess is that chambering would add maybe $200. I think it should be an option. In my experience, extra weight is the price you pay for high quality, but lower price. That is why Music Man is $2,000 instead of $4,000 like a boutique bass.
The one I got has a spalted maple top. I cannot imagine it would be an extra $200 to run a drill press around the ash/ alder before putting the top on to to lighten it up. or taking some material off during what I would assume to be a cnc type process.
But, your point you IS valid.
But, given the generally acknowledged appreciation for these basses and the weight issue. It would seem they would try to address that to sell more.