Which is why I feel fortunate that of my four current projects only one has a drummer, and he's top notch (and a good guy, too).
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It seems basics like, "Know your part, and play it" are lost on our ambitions as people. We want to do so much more than know our part and play it. Basics like, "Keep us in time, and play in the pocket with me" are just too insulting for some. If you youtube it, Bill Evans is in a documentary hosted by Steve Allen, where Bill talks about "playing honestly" vs "confusion." Bill says it's better to play a simpler part, correctly, and slowly grow your playing adding an intentional bit to what you do, where you know what/why you are adding it (he calls that "playing honestly") rather than approximating something more complex, fuzzing it up and not being precise, and then your development is stuck - because you are adding confusion and you can't build on confusion. WOW.
Which is why I feel fortunate that of my four current projects only one has a drummer, and he's top notch (and a good guy, too).

Wow, indeed. Bill's insights are profound...yet intuitively obvious.
Another way I might render the point is "mature vs. immature". Because a mature player - of any instrument - will have developed more than sufficient chops to handle the situation at hand...and will realize that because he doesn't have to worry about insufficient chops, he is then free to focus on his actual musicianship. An immature player will often fail to transcend that particular hurdle. If he's insecure about his chops, he'll try to overcome his perceived weakness by making it all about chops. And if he's got great chops, he'll often push his "chops agenda" to the nth degree...hoping his chops will compensate for any potential weakness in musicianship - even to the point of entering into Bill Evans' "zone of confusion". MM
There is some truth to that ... sometimes it's a bit liberating to play without a drummer - lower volume, more room for details to be heard, fewer people fighting over where the beat is.Wasn't it Chet Baker who said "It takes a really good drummer to be better than no drummer"?
...
HA! I just got done playing with "THAT" guy a few months ago!I've had the problem of a drummer being very good at drums, but an ass child in every other way.
What the drummer contributes is so foundational and so exposed that it affects every other instrument - and the band as a whole - in ways that no amount of tweaking and adjusting can ever alter or disguise.
MM
My experience is really that most bands' weak spot is the singing, it's much more noticeable when the vocals are weak. Maybe being bass players we personally suffer more when we don't gel with the drummer, but I think the audience hear something else.