• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Winter Buildoff 2019 Voting - Final

Vote for your top 3 choices


  • Total voters
    423
  • Poll closed .
Love the Mothman idea! Like @Jisch , I’d need somebody to post the backstory, but as famous as it is around here it would garner lots of attention at voting time!

Mothman has quite a history here at TB

Just Google Mothman bass, and most of the returns you get are from TB.

One of which
tal-mothman-jpg.1160285
 
I am now fully up to date on Mothman, anyone know where I can get that half hour back?

If you are so inclined, I have heard that Mothman has the power of time shifting. If you become "best buds", you might get that 1/2 hour back. You might loose your life as well. Just sayin
 
You know, I was not planning on any builds in the next year or two for various reasons, but I would totally be in a Mothman build-off.

Many do not know the power of the Mothman, but he has been known to compel people to do strange things. I'm sure in some dark corner of the world, the Mothman is now sharpening his claws, invoking demons and succubi by the thousands, to invade our minds and workshops, so that he may multiply upon this earth. We have opened Pandora's box.
 
^ when I drew it up, it seemed to be the best size with a 26.25" scale length. No matter how I drew it up, I kept coming back to that scale and wondered why it had ever been built as a bass. I was just doing some conversions to metric and lo and behold... 26.25" x 25.4 (for conversion to mm) = 666.75mm ...
 
^ when I drew it up, it seemed to be the best size with a 26.25" scale length. No matter how I drew it up, I kept coming back to that scale and wondered why it had ever been built as a bass. I was just doing some conversions to metric and lo and behold... 26.25" x 25.4 (for conversion to mm) = 666.75mm ...
I think the only way to really make it work (yours looks cool headless) is to abandon the original body shape and instead take elements from it to something more ergonomic. The lower bouts do seem to lend themselves to a headless tuning mech. Do away with the sharp cutout waist, shrink and offset the horns. The overlay of bloodwood with cutouts revealing the body wood beneath is slick, could do some cool things aesthetically with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
^ when I drew it up, it seemed to be the best size with a 26.25" scale length. No matter how I drew it up, I kept coming back to that scale and wondered why it had ever been built as a bass. I was just doing some conversions to metric and lo and behold... 26.25" x 25.4 (for conversion to mm) = 666.75mm ...

If my math is correct a 26.25" scale Mothman would "only" weight 14.99 lbs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
Oooo, what if you flipped the body making the upper bout the lower and vice versa. Shrink the bout widths heavier on the new upper bout than the lower...

Makes me want to play with Photoshop, got a gig in a few, maybe tomorrow... :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
I think the only way to really make it work (yours looks cool headless) is to abandon the original body shape and instead take elements from it to something more ergonomic. The lower bouts do seem to lend themselves to a headless tuning mech. Do away with the sharp cutout waist, shrink and offset the horns. The overlay of bloodwood with cutouts revealing the body wood beneath is slick, could do some cool things aesthetically with that.
My original mashup plan was 1/2" roundover, seafoam green and a white pearloid pickguard... "What if Fender made the Mothman?" :bag: