• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wisdom on Prince from Gene Simmons

I love how people can trash one guy, call him the lowest of the low and harbor all kinds of resentment for expressing his opinion about something - and make a saint out of someone who, well, IMO, doesn't deserve that sainthood. While piling it on others who have a different opinion of the guy than you.

And yes, some of you here are making the guy out to be a saint.

Gene Simmons = bad boy, bad BAD boy. Prince = good boy. We're all just a bunch 'o frikken idiots :). My opinion.

The internet is fun.

The funny thing is how well this post works if you switch the names.
:D
 
I wouldn't have minded if he trashed one of my guitars, as it has been said; You would have a story about Prince. BUT I never would have handed him my number one.

Me neither. Because I know tossing instruments was part of his schtick. And I don't have faith that it would always be caught.
:)

So did Kirk. I'd just as soon hand it to Pete Townsend.
 
Last edited:
I was differentiating between having an illness and the actions that one takes to hurt others as a result of that illness. I think, though one cannot be blamed for his illness, one can be blamed for using his will to hurt others-shy of cases where there is a detachment from reality (a debatable thing in itself). Heroin addiction is not evil, but it may cause people to do evil things, for instance. Maybe there isn't any line to begin with, I don't know.

I disagree about JD and his ilk. He knew the difference between right and wrong, just as most serial killers do. They just have a strong compulsion to kill.

In other news, it seems that Gene has apologized for his comments. That's something.

So his compulsion to kill was voluntary?

As far as that apology... it doesn't read like much of one to me.
 
That is an outright lie. I already told you I had nothing against the guy--I enjoy what I know of his music, respect him as a musician, had been neutral about him as a person--but I just don't agree with you that it was no big deal. And I wouldn't care who did it, I would feel the exact same way.

Somehow you keep seeing "no big deal".

Why?
 
So his compulsion to kill was voluntary?

As far as that apology... it doesn't read like much of one to me.

Like I said, I'm not totally decided on this myself. The existence of the compulsion certainly isn't voluntary, but, unlike someone with psychosis who is completely detached from reality, and who has no more choice in his actions than a hurricane or other natural disaster, to hurt someone is still a conscious choice for the psychopath.

Perhaps some compulsions must be classified as inherently "evil," even though the sufferer had no say in the matter. The two variables here are the degree of control one has over his actions, and the degree to which the actions should be considered immoral.
 
Last edited:
I love this sentence from Kirk's interview! Classy way to break even:

"That's something I want to live on. It was a complete honor for Prince to play this guitar but I can't give him the honor of being the last person to play this guitar. So that's why it was such a joy to have it back. And I actually got the Epiphone back just hours before the tribute concert. And Prince totally made good on it and took care of it. I don't regret Prince borrowing the guitar. Sometimes, what seems like something negative can turn positive and this was definitely a blessing in a very heavily shrouded disguise."
 
I love this sentence from Kirk's interview! Classy way to break even:

"That's something I want to live on. It was a complete honor for Prince to play this guitar but I can't give him the honor of being the last person to play this guitar. So that's why it was such a joy to have it back. And I actually got the Epiphone back just hours before the tribute concert. And Prince totally made good on it and took care of it. I don't regret Prince borrowing the guitar. Sometimes, what seems like something negative can turn positive and this was definitely a blessing in a very heavily shrouded disguise."
As others have said, if Kirk Douglas is alright with how things turned out, the rest of us just look petty dwelling on the incidrng.
 
Like I said, I'm not totally decided on this myself. The existence of the compulsion certainly isn't voluntary, but, unlike someone with psychosis who is completely detached from reality, and who has no more choice in his actions than a hurricane or other natural disaster, to hurt someone is still a conscious choice for the psychopath.

Perhaps some compulsions must be classified as inherently "evil," even though the sufferer had no say in the matter. The two variables here are the degree of control one has over his actions, and the degree to which the actions should be considered immoral.

Eating people is pretty damned detached in my book.
 
Well, this thread certainly has grown.
I'm convinced that he has an emotional disorder.
That's all well and good, and it is an interesting contention that I've mulled over a bit. However, it's just speculation. And using it as a jumping-off point to sermonize on the stigmatization of mental illness and how folks who say bad things about Simmons lack empathy is an entirely different matter. Particularly when you don't really know the guy much, and apparently (based on the lack of response) do not have any training or expertise in this area.
We really don't know what happened to Prince yet. I hope we do so that the stupid stuff on the tabloids can be put to rest and if painkillers were involved the issue coming to light can help others.
Right on. On this, we certainly agree.
No, and I don't see why you need to resort to reductio ad absurdum to entertain the possibility that some people lack empathic skills others take for granted..
Admittedly, I went overboard on this point. Still, I just don't see much evidence to support your contention. Lots of people say douchey stuff, he just makes the choice to say it loudly through the press. It would be interesting to speculate about the potential issues of a certain other '70s rocker, but that would be treading into political territory.;)
I think it's ironic that you think you're in the business of giving people breaks and passes. Good thing we have you to decide who gets slack..
Wrong. I'm clearly speaking in general terms, and I personally haven't called Simmons a name in this thread. It was in fact you who first used the "pass" language, in regard to Prince: "He gets a pass because we like him or his music, or his "contribution to culture." And we know physical pain."
I don't care whether you think I know anything about emotional disorders anymore than I care whether you're actually the judge that you make yourself out to be. You don't have to lay an egg to know a rotten one.
If you don't like Gene, call him names. If you think people who do drugs are bad, call them names too.
Again, I don't think of myself as a judge. I could easily contend that you've done as much judging in this thread as anyone. If you're trying to draw a parallel between people here calling Gene names and what Gene said about Prince, I'd say that's a false equivalency. And that has nothing to do with how society treats the mentally ill versus addicts (who still get stigmatized quite a bit, IMO). Instead, it has to do with the fact that we have no idea whether Gene has an emotional disorder, and with the huge disparity in audience and venue. Simmons knew perfectly well that his comments about Prince would be broadcast nationally (perhaps globally), and that Prince's family and friends would likely hear them. Meanwhile, there's no reason to believe Simmons is ever going to hear about any of the comments in this thread.

As I said elsewhere, though, at least he's since apologized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese