I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.Jeez. You having a bad day Jim? What gives?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.Jeez. You having a bad day Jim? What gives?
No, I really don't think it carries any more expectations than Kleenex does. And you can read some of the posts in this thread that demonstrate why it was nothing more than a name that sells product.You have to admit that the name "Woodstock" carries with it connotations, and with that, expectations. I agree that it ought to mirror, at least in most ways, what the original did.
However, I also agree that the original was an aligning of the stars, and that they should just let it go, rather than tarnish what that was.
Let alone ZombiesI dunno about going to a concert with Dead and Company. I have enough issues dealing with people that are alive.
Except that's not really the case. I made mention to the violence that has broken out at these events, where I live to someone talking about Woodstock being about peace and love. I don't really care what's going on that incites violence. I ain't attending. My dislike for hip hop has nothing to do with it.Well that is the recurring theme in your posts. You don't like hip hop and you're using these alleged "studies" to justify how horrible it is...just like people did all throughout history when confronted by youth culture that didn't go along with their beliefs. This is nothing new whatsoever.
No, I really don't think it carries any more expectations than Kleenex does. And you can read some of the posts in this thread that demonstrate why it was nothing more than a name that sells product.
Yeah, we do love to romanticize things that happened in our younger days and do our best to present them to the current crop of younger folks in a way to "prove" that "we were better than you." But the truth is that the "sense of community" that we romanticize about was overshadowed by a lot of people peeing and pooping in the open, leaving tons of garbage that took a very long time to clean up, and a tremendous amount of gate crashers who forced the promoters to start letting people in for free out of safety concerns despite having the absolute right to charge people. Only years and years of hindsight conjures up these images of "community." Back then, it was, as you said, "just another mega concert."
I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.
[thats a joke]I actually like a lot of today's music. Most of what I've been listening to is being made by people who are half my age. Do I have to like all of it?I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.
I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.
Well, who should be playing then?
Day 1
Iron Maiden
Volbeat
Metallica
Judas Priest
Muse
Queensryche
Rush
Hammerfall
Sabaton
Saxon
AC/DC
"1989 the number"
Can't believe I was spinning this THIRTY years ago. 30!! Even harder to believe that three decades later,
there are those who (still) refuse to recognize not only the genre, but its ultimate triumph in the marketplace.
If it never was alive, then it can't die. The big mistake they made was thinking that that dream ever had a chance in hell of happening.
And it's off to the overheard band names thread we go.
What does that mean? Recognize the genera? Triumph in the market place? I'd say most people who don't care for hip hop recognize it as a genera and also understand that it's tremendously popular (successful). It almost sounds like you're saying that because of it's success and becoming mainstream, it's hard for you to believe that some people (still) don't embrace/like it. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, just seems like an odd thing to say.![]()
I just get sick of people who grew up in an era that should know better than to turn into grumpy old farts whining about today's music turning into a bunch of grumpy old farts whining about today's music.
"1989 the number"
Can't believe I was spinning this THIRTY years ago. 30!! Even harder to believe that three decades later,
there are those who (still) refuse to recognize not only the genre, but its ultimate triumph in the marketplace.
If it never was alive, then it can't die. The big mistake they made was thinking that that dream ever had a chance in hell of happening.