I've been defending audiences against their (fortunately few) blamers, so I prolly oughta say why.
My theory....
Audiences have spent their lives hearing well-written, well-played, well-sung and well-produced music. From 78rmp LPs to the latest streaming services, that's what they are used to. Same as we are.
They know what's well-done when they hear it. It doesn't matter if they don't know
why. The proof is always in the pudding, and you don't have to know how to cook it in order to know if it's well-made.
Any remotely honest musician or other industry pro already knows that national bands are almost always more well-made than local bands, and that Saturday bands are almost always better than Wednesday bands. Better at writing and/or playing and/or singing and/or performing. And usually better at most or all of those.
Audiences determine whether a band goes national or stays on the Wednesday slot. Not bigwigs, politics, or any other denialist excuse. It's
audiences.
And no, it's not a matter of "they know what they like when they hear it", because that's how they support or boycott
genres. It's a matter of they know what's
good when they hear it, because that's how they support or boycott bands
within those genres. They take some of them national, and they inexplicably continue being "too stupid to recognize the genius" of the Wednesday losers who can't write, play, sing or perform.
Consider also that most audience members within any geographic area (and within their favored genre) have supported and liked up-and-coming bands who had futures, and who were better than the bands they left behind (at least until they self-destructed).
And yet most musicians in that same area (and genre) have NOT been IN those bands. And many of them are
critical of those bands.
The audience is better at picking winners than we are.
Some of us may have all-consuming emotional motives for trying to live in denial of this, but we do so at our peril.
Aaaand that's my theory.