• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

2013 Ampeg V-4B 100W Reissue Pt2

So, I use a wireless and EIMs, I'm thinking about this setup with a 112. I don't need a lot of stage volume and the band uses a large PA system with subs. I dig the look. But would still need a small rack for the wireless stuff. Other than putting it behind the cab, does anyone know of a two space rack ampeg style of just a straight black tolex. I don't want to destroy the look with a rack sitting on top.
 
Still loving this set up. There's just something about it that sounds so dang good! Shots from yesterday's outing...not a bad view from the 'stage' either....(that 'rope' on the ground is actually some solar powered lighting that defines the dance floor.)

For this gig, no FOH, Master up full, Gain at ~10 o'clock and still room on the bass volume knobs...

20151003_155524.jpg 20151003_145229.jpg
 
Last edited:
You can go either way...either with the slave out or the FX loop, but you'll have to have both the send and return hooked up. Actually, if your tuner has its own mute button, that might be preferable to use the loop over the slave out, but both will work.
 
You can go either way...either with the slave out or the FX loop, but you'll have to have both the send and return hooked up. Actually, if your tuner has its own mute button, that might be preferable to use the loop over the slave out, but both will work.

I think you only need to feed back to the effects return if you use the effects send. Slave Out shouldn't interrupt the signal path to the output section.