• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A bass you would never consider playing

And guys- make sure not to turn this into an "ugly bass" thread, or it will get shut down.

A Rickenbaker. I know everyone goes nuts over them, but I think they're ugly as sin.

People should really have to take a test on the rules before they are allowed to post.

Just FYI, these are the bass forum rules mentioned (see post 5): Updated 11-24-11 : Basses Forum Rules PLEASE READ
I understand it's not in the main Terms of Service you see when you sign up so it can be missed, which is why people receive a warning first. No big deal.

Let's move on. Thanks.
 
This one is pretty much the only Bass I would not play,..they are slimy and slippery, plus they lack the resonance I am used to
Unknown.jpeg
 
No such thing as a bass I would not consider because of brand or traditional body style. Unless it is shaped like a penis or a butt I will give it a play and/or a listen.

This pretty much sums it up for me. If its 4-6 strings in 30-35 scale I'll give it a try.

However basses I wouldn't play are basses I can't use. I can't find a use in my style of playing for 10 string extended range and the rest of the extended range family.
 
This one is pretty much the only Bass I would not play,..they are slimy and slippery, plus they lack the resonance I am used to
View attachment 795000

I'd play that one too.

This pretty much sums it up for me. If its 4-6 strings in 30-35 scale I'll give it a try.

However basses I wouldn't play are basses I can't use. I can't find a use in my style of playing for 10 string extended range and the rest of the extended range family.

but would you at least give that 10 string a try?