TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think he was getting at the fact that ugly bass threads are against the rules.Read the rules a few times, and I didn't do anything wrong. Posted my opinion on a bass I'd never consider playing. Didn't pick on anyone or call anyone out. You on the other hand....
And guys- make sure not to turn this into an "ugly bass" thread, or it will get shut down.
A Rickenbaker. I know everyone goes nuts over them, but I think they're ugly as sin.
People should really have to take a test on the rules before they are allowed to post.
No such thing as a bass I would not consider because of brand or traditional body style. Unless it is shaped like a penis or a butt I will give it a play and/or a listen.
This one is pretty much the only Bass I would not play,..they are slimy and slippery, plus they lack the resonance I am used to
View attachment 795000
This pretty much sums it up for me. If its 4-6 strings in 30-35 scale I'll give it a try.
However basses I wouldn't play are basses I can't use. I can't find a use in my style of playing for 10 string extended range and the rest of the extended range family.
I'd play that one too.
but would you at least give that 10 string a try?
Yeah, I'm sure I wouldn't like it, but id give one a shotI played a 7 once, a Conklin. Tone was average. Its not that I can't play a 7 or more string basses, but I don't know what to do with all the extra notes.
??Any bass owned by that freak who kept those three women captive for ten years.