• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AudioKinesis Cabs Part VI...

Yeah, I was surprised at that. I was also surprised how much heavier the TC212 was. I can one-hand my TC118... the TC212, not so much. Love these cabs though. I didn't get to even play with the switches too much on the back of yours, or try opening the ports. But, I play my TC118 plugged up.

Yeah, more drivers/more weight, I suspect. I'm not sure about the total volume of the box and if that would have anything to do with weight, but it's a very easy two-handed carry. If you have a cart/dolly like this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...liid=I3J1IG4TZ69GS8&ref_=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl it's even easier. I'm really itching to get that CN112 to downsize my rig even further. Aggy TH500, CN112, and a gig bag, and I'll be a lightweight one-trip gigger again.
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
  • Like
Reactions: JdoubleH
Yeah, more drivers/more weight, I suspect. I'm not sure about the total volume of the box and if that would have anything to do with weight, but it's a very easy two-handed carry. If you have a cart/dolly like this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...liid=I3J1IG4TZ69GS8&ref_=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl it's even easier. I'm really itching to get that CN112 to downsize my rig even further. Aggy TH500, CN112, and a gig bag, and I'll be a lightweight one-trip gigger again.

I am all about the lightweight one trip load in. Although I did compromise a little weight and get an eden Wt 550 instead of the TH500 which I had before. I can still sling the Eden over my shoulder, the bass on the other, and carry the TC112 and still have one hand to open the door...
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
  • Like
Reactions: Marial
I got this about 3 years ago.. I am ROUGH on it. and it has lasted...
I can fit two Genz Uber 115s or Uber 410s face to face with a two rack space amp with a fender TB1200 and pedal board on top . . Obviously the bigger ones can carry more.
and it folds up real small.. If it broke i would get another..

Rock N Roller R2RT Micro Multi-Cart
 
the kart a bag stuff is great. i've had one for 22 years and counting. i've had to replace some parts. i used to put 2 small 1x15 cabs and an amp head on it for one-trip loads. currently i can get 2 hathor 1203 cabs and 2 pedal/amp boxes on it.

i have this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001BLJTY0/ref=s9_hps_bw_g229_i1

which has the bonus of the kickback wheels, making moving stuff a breeze (you don't have to hold stuff up while you move it). this thing really saved my back.
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
Oh man. So many cool options out there. I'll have to read about most of these and just pick one. The main need is small size when folded down. I don't mind making two trips back and forth, especially since the cart will be doing most of the work. But, if it can't fit in the car, well, it'll be useless :P Thank you all for the suggestions!
 
I use this one.

Link Removed

It holds my Keyboard x stand, two audiokinesis cabs, equipment bag, keyboard, pedal board, and amp. I have to use a strap of course to keep things tight. I've had it for 5 years now and it has worked excellent.

Speaking of straps, this is a sweet one. Retractable too!

http://www.amazon.com/Erickson-3441...1448906763&sr=8-1&keywords=retractable+straps

The one thing I will say about the WESCO cart above is that it doubles as a speaker platform. Good for those gigs when you want to get your speakers off of the floor due to boominess / hollow stage.

image.jpeg
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
  • Like
Reactions: steubig
When you say "wide body"... well, what exactly do you mean? Horizontal orientation?
Nope. Duke used to provide the option of a wide-body cab. Same height and depth, but wide enough to accommodate a tube amp or rack. I got the last set of wide-body boards, though.
At one point the TC115 was available in a differently proportioned cabinet which was wider - internal volume was close to the same, IIRC.
Larger internal volume. Lower bass extension. ;)
Which driver is this? It replaced the original? And which setting do you consider "grindy"? Thanks!

Check out his site for grindy info. As stated a few pages ago, Duke just had a new driver made for the new Hathor 15's he'll be making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John D Harris
Hm. It looks pretty alright. Do you have that one? I'd like to check it out in person before dropping the coin. If it can hold two hard cases, a 2U rack in one go... then a 2x10 can and whatever AK cab in another go, that'd be pretty nice.

I am not currently using it, but I had one of those when I was contracting on a military base. It was well built and did the job. I mostly used it to cart around computer/network equipment including monitors and tools. I used one for a couple of years and never had a problem with it.

I am currently using one of these: Rock N Roller R8 Cart They are nice and work great. Plus they fold up for storage, however, they don't fold up as small as the one Marial posted.

If my Rock N Roller cart broke or got stolen, I would buy another one!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: svtb15
What would be the difference between the hathor 212 and tc212?

The TC's use very high quality HF drivers & wave guides.
The Hathor's use paper cone drivers - iirc, 3" to 5" together with special rear wave chambering to openings to the top & sides of the cabinet.
Duke also has switch controlled crossovers that make the most of good driver selection & cabinet design & tuning (with port plugs for even more tunable low end options).
Please correct me if I'm wrong on any points.

You're right on all points, thanks for posting.

The Thunderchild cabs will do the "studio smooth" thing. Thunderchilds 112 in 8 ohms and 212 (which uses the same woofer) have a little bit of grindy available at a switch-flip, but not much. The new version of the Thunderchild 115 that SpankyPants - ah, make that Mr. SpankyPants - mentioned has a bit more of the grindy going on, so it's the most versatile tone-wise of the Thunderchild series. It's not as grindy as a Hathor cab, but it comes the closest.

The Hathor series came along later, after I came up with a theory as to where the goal posts are for electric bass. Briefly, the Hathor cabs zig and zag in approximate mirror-image of where most electric guitar cabs zag and zig. The intention is to "slot" well in the mix. So where the guitars are loud, the Hathor cabs step back a bit let them own that sonic turf. But then where the guitars tend to be more laid back, we can step forward and have our grindy without stepping on anyone's sonic toes and possibly instigating a volume war. The grindy can be tamed via a switch if you want a smoother sound. Unfortunately none of the Hathor cabs can really mimic the smoothy of the Thunderchild series, but the forthcoming Hathor 212 might come pretty close.

[Re: Hathor 212 w/cone mid + tweet] How about ditch the tweeter and have a 6" and a 3"? Or a pair of 3". To me Hathor = paper cone = big win.

The horn tweeter would be coming in fairly high up, and imo a good tweeter is sweeter in the treble than a good paper cone. If you wanted that paper cone vibe, you'd just switch the horn off. My hope is to make the Hathor 212 more tonally versatile than the other Hathor cabs have been.

Which driver is this [in the SpankyPants's new Thunderchild 115]? It replaced the original? And which setting do you consider "grindy"? Thanks!

Eminence has made a new custom 15" Kappalite-based woofer for me that has a peak where I want one, and no peaks where I don't want any. "Grindy" mode would be with the peak left in, and "smoothy" mode would be with the peak filtered out, and there's a switch on the back of the cab for that. The woofer was originally developed for a Hathor series cab but I thought it might work well in a Thunderchild cab if I got the switch to work well.

Speaking of "new designs": A different thing but, what i thought may be my "dream standalone cab": a TC 112 with the mid drivers and chambers of the hathor instead of the horn. I own a TC 112v1 and sometimes miss the cutting mids a little bit but like the low end extension of it very much (apart from everything else). Haven't heard, played the Hathor in Reality though, only heard in clips here, but as i heard and read it doesn't extend as low as the TC; (is smaller, lighter, more portable, tighter (?) therefore, of course)
As i understood, a "growly-switch" on the newer version of the TC was a step in that direction.
Just an idea, if not already mentioned before. May also be to much, "messing up the lines", but thats what i thought.

The Hathor 1203 is my answer to calls for a 110 cab. I looked at all the available 10" woofers and decided that the Kappalite 3012LF shoehorned into as small a box as reasonably possible was the best 110-ish cab I could do.

That being said, it is possible that I might do a TC112-sized Hathor cab one day, but it doesn't push the boundaries of my product line as far as some other things I have in mind, so that day is probably not right around the corner.

The growly switch in the new TC115 is made possible by my custom woofer. I'd need to use a midrange driver to bring on the growly with the other woofers I use.
 
Last edited:
The horn tweeter would be coming in fairly high up, and imo a good tweeter is sweeter in the treble than a good paper cone. If you wanted that paper cone vibe, you'd just switch the horn off. My hope is to make the Hathor 212 more tonally versatile than the other Hathor cabs have been.

Don't you want/need the 3" to "fill the gap" between what the 12" can do and the sweet spot for the horn?

Just seems that there is something in the upper mids that the 3" does that a horn or tweeter can't - at least not with the same flavor. So if you really want to get wacky, 12-3-horn, with both the 3" and the horn switchable. :D