Isn't it awesome that a few amps have potentiometers that allow a person to use their entire range without sounding like a triple-rectifier on crack.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah, I remember on my old Acoustic 370 head I could never get it much over 3. It got all its volume at low settings. But the Mesa and MB are at least not on that kind of taper. I wasn't really expecting them to be identical any way, but it does seem like as an 800w head the Mesa is not showing much power so far. To be fair, I've only had it in rehearsal.
Mark, if I recall correctly, these cabinets don't show signs of strain like typical cabinets do. I will have to be extra cautious. I may only use the Mesa when two cabinets are called for or in rehearsal volume just to be safe.
I have to admit that I was a little shy to crank the controls on the D-800 at first and felt that maybe it was tad weaker than I expected for its ratings. Having been subliminally trained (from past gear I've owned) that by 10-12 o'clock I'm already at 90% of full output potential, the D-800 took some mental re-calibrating.
Once I got over my instinctive fear of turning anything labeled volume/master past about half way and expecting a result, my initial impression that it seemed a little quieter than I had expected vanished. After I got used to playing a bass head where control knob positions closely reflected the actual output power setting, I immediately realized that not only was the D-800 quite powerful, but I was better able to dial in exactly what I wanted volume-wise. And I should add that I really appreciate how an occasional unintended bump of a volume control (input or master) doesn't translate into either whisper quiet output or a sudden increase in the sound that could drown out a jet engine.
Glockenklang amps (at least those I've played) are this way with regard to volume and gain settings. I believe that Euphonic Audio are, as well. There are others.I have to admit that I was a little shy to crank the controls on the D-800 at first and felt that maybe it was tad weaker than I expected for its ratings. Having been subliminally trained (from past gear I've owned) that by 10-12 o'clock I'm already at 90% of full output potential, the D-800 took some mental re-calibrating.
Once I got over my instinctive fear of turning anything labeled volume/master past about half way and expecting a result, my initial impression that it seemed a little quieter than I had expected vanished. After I got used to playing a bass head where control knob positions closely reflected the actual output power setting, I immediately realized that not only was the D-800 quite powerful, but I was better able to dial in exactly what I wanted volume-wise. And I should add that I really appreciate how an occasional unintended bump of a volume control (input or master) doesn't translate into either whisper quiet output or a sudden increase in the sound that could drown out a jet engine.
The Mesa D-800 was my first bass head with that kind of taper, and being a heavy Mesa Carbine user it was a serious adjustment!Glockenklang amps (at least those I've played) are this way with regard to volume and gain settings. I believe that Euphonic Audio are, as well. There are others.
I've read about the Carbines! I think that if I'd had one I'd have swapped the volume pot for another of the same value but a more gradual taper.The Mesa D-800 was my first bass head with that kind of taper, and being a heavy Mesa Carbine user it was a serious adjustment!![]()
I tried the d800 a few times and never quite bonded with it..not sure why maybe i just needed to meddle with the eq more.
I think folks who like more open top end will likely find better success with the 800+ from what I have read and heard. The D-800 is okay for me as the native voicing suits me fine, and it's rare that I don't attenuate higher frequencies on my GK MB and Mesa Carbine heads. The D-800 EQ is sort of focused on the lower side IME for folks coming from heads where mid EQ is more in the 800-1000 Hz range and treble EQ tends to be 4KHz or higher. Once again I like the D-800, but would bet the 800+ is a much better head for folks who want more control, options and presence in the higher frequencies.I tried the d800 a few times and never quite bonded with it..not sure why maybe i just needed to meddle with the eq more.
For me, a warm class D is my Aguilar TH500. While I'm not real familiar with the Ampeg line, they have some warm sounding class D heads as well, at least to my ear.It does a lot of things well, but I wouldn't describe it as warm. The highs in particular is where that bothers me a bit. But it has so many ways to adjust the tone I can get something I can live with. I like everything else about it.
Having experienced both extremes, I would much rather have a master volume control with a nice gentle taper, like the D800.Got the Mesa D800+ and the only concern seems to be that it runs 800w even when there's just one cabinet plugged in at 4ohms. Strangely, the volume is lower than similar settings on the 500w Markbass.
Pain in the neck...
This is my first post with the AK community, but I recently received a beautiful AK Changeling 12T cab! I've been saving up for a head to pair with it (hopefully soon!) and was curious if anyone had by chance tried the TC RH750 with any AK cab (Hathor or TC). Looking forward to finding a solid partner for this beautiful feat of audio engineering![]()
It’s gonna start spinning faster once you plug it up and get lost in what it does. Curious to hear your thoughts on it when you get the chance. I was gonna type ‘when you get back to reality’ but these cabs of Duke’s make reality so much better!View attachment 2934630 This arrived at my office today. Woohooo! Thanks, Duke.
Suddenly the clock ticking has gotten much slower.