@MarkA
This choice in no way diminishes my.
Massive respect for the subway line
I may prefer the Subway tone to this can *shrug*
The WD is so flexible EQ wise I doubt I will have a hard time dialling it in close.
Without a gigging situation it will be tough to compare directly for a while yet .
What I can say is the TC is a little less deep than the SW115. A little tighter (with the ports closed ) overall.
Ports open its depth is the 115s equal, but it loosens quite a bit, some of that tightness returns when 2 of the 4 ports are closed . The rear firing horn will be interesting live, we'll see!
The TC lacks that little sumthin that the SW112 brings to the party.
The TC is more accurate , brighter, and cleaner (the SW charm is in the character)
I don't expect the TC will achieve the sheer volume or "slam factor" that the SW does. Though I rarely needed it.
The main motivation for this change, was a reference monitor, a more "pa" like platform for my stage monitor as more and more often I find that live the FOH sounds so different from that tone I am hearing onstage.
As I now also own the PA that will be the FOH at many of our gigs this is expected to be a tool to "even" the playing field (soundscape).
My hope is that I'll be able to tailor the preamp, and HPF to send the house "my" preferred EQ/tone and let them cut what the need for "the mix"
It may fail as an experiment , were I able to keep both Mesa and the TC I would have. Financially and space wise not feasible .
I may get a Mesa cab again.
Likely a 2x15

I'd like a neo 8x8 designed by Andy though

(I miss my SWR henry )
Hope this helps others.