TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ampwedge, between horizontal cabs.
I dig it.
![]()
Yeah, I saw the 212 on the website, but the size and weight doesn't appeal to me. I'm curious about the ML115 though. I'd guess that it would weigh another 7-8 pounds over the 112, which is not bad considering how much more output it should have. Truthfully, that 112 probably has all the volume I need. I've done most of my gigging with "regular" 112's for a few years now.and a 212.
Yeah, I saw the 212 on the website, but the size and weight doesn't appeal to me. I'm curious about the ML115 though. I'd guess that it would weigh another 7-8 pounds over the 112, which is not bad considering how much more output it should have. Truthfully, that 112 probably has all the volume I need. I've done most of my gigging with "regular" 112's for a few years now.
the cabs are set up at the factory with tee-nuts and machine screws already in place to install our caster kit.
I like the wedge Chef! As cool as that is, do you prefer the vertical stack?
And you reviews and feedback is very very helpful and compelling.![]()
So is the ML112 really like a "better db112" like I've heard a few times? I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE the db112, but the form factor and weight leave a little to be desired. I've been on the edge between trying to decide if I want to pickup a DB212 or the new Genz Nx2 212. The Nx2 212 easily wins the weight/form factor argument, at an average of 47lbs. It wont have the upper-mid aggression that I love in the DB cabs though. This Baer thing looks really promising. I skimmed through both mega threads last night...gosh, I don't need another cab. It just never ends, does it?
So is the ML112 really like a "better db112" like I've heard a few times? I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE the db112, but the form factor and weight leave a little to be desired. I've been on the edge between trying to decide if I want to pickup a DB212 or the new Genz Nx2 212. The Nx2 212 easily wins the weight/form factor argument, at an average of 47lbs. It wont have the upper-mid aggression that I love in the DB cabs though. This Baer thing looks really promising. I skimmed through both mega threads last night...gosh, I don't need another cab. It just never ends, does it?
I also love the DB112's, and had the opportunity to spend quite a bit of quality time with the ML112. The ML112 is a large 112 (due to the mid driver design) but is a few pounds lighter than the DB112, and is not as deep front to back, nor does it have rear ports like the DB112, resulting in it not taking up as much space on stage.
The ML112 has a handle on the top that can be trouble with some micro heads with their small feet, but Roger nicely designed the cab/logo to look 'good' on its side, and has rubber feet already installed on one side of the cab to allow for it to be set 'vertically' for use with a micro (i.e., it goes from 'wide with a handle on top' for full sized heads to 'thin with no handle on top' for micro's. Nice little design detail there.
The tone is quite a bit brighter up top.... the midrange is kind of shifted up from the mid mid warmth and punch of the DB112 to a bit more of a bright, grindy but still very organic (NOTHING like the top end of a fEARful for example) top end. This can be easily controlled if you have an amp with a fixed upper midrange control centered somewhere around 1K.
IMO, it would be hard to like one (DB112/ML112) and hate the other. Definitely in the same tone universe of 'organic, mid punchy, warm' type cabs. The ML112 is superior for those who include some 'amp or pedal driven' grind or distortion in their sound, given the very 'papercone' voiced mid driver. It also gives you a nice slap tone that sits in a mix nicely (versus the 'bit too much sizzle' of some tweeter loaded cabs).
I'd be happy with either of these cabs. With the TH500, hard to beat those DB112's if you can deal with the size/weight/form factor.
Edit: I do feel that the ML112 will outperform the DB112 in absolute volume given the same wattage input. So, for a single cab solution, I would prefer the ML112. For a double cab solution, either would be great. I like the idea of the DB112/NT112 (or whatever the no tweeter version is called) with the Aguilars, and two of those would be plenty for most things. The DB's really like mid complex/present heads to my ear. Loved mine with the Thunderfunk, the TH450, and the TH500. Really is almost the definition of 'modern meets vintage' to my ear... kind of like a sealed multi 10 cab with a nice, subtle tweeter. Roger's cab gives you a bit of that vibe also, since the mid driver he uses allows for that 'vintage cone break-up' type thing that so many ejoyed with the old JBL 15 loaded cabs. Two flavors of excellent.
Another always useful post from my friend Ken! Thanks bro!
From memory, I think a single DB112 was 45 lbs. Not crazy heavy, but in that range things can start being awkward to move around at times.Okay, so now I'm on the "really interested in Baer ML112" Bandwagon.
Remind me again about the weight, size and form factor of the Baer compared to the DB112?
Another always useful post from my friend Ken! Thanks bro!
The AE410 was the one I never had a chance to try, just because I knew I didn't want a 410 in the back of my head. I think I would have liked that cabinet, or the newer AE210 that stacks vertically.Another thing to put the ML112 in context for you. I heard MUCH similarity between the 10 loaded Bergantino AE cabs and the ML112... that same 'tight but slammin' low end and bright but not harsh upper mid presence. If you are still digging your AE410, I won't say that the ML112 sounds identical, but you will definitely feel at home, especially if you dial back the tweeter a smidge on the AE410.