• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Band break up - did I do the right thing?

Perhaps the band was lacking leadership and the new drummer tried to fill the void? Sounds like drummer doesn't know the difference between leadership and dictatorship and acted like B when perhaps A was needed.

Hard to see how it could have ended well.
 
Most of this is on you guys, sadly. Let me show you where you went horribly wrong:

You say "no"

You say "we're done here". Seriously. It's your band. It's not his band. He should be out the door at this point with a bootprint on the seat of his pants.


You say "we're done here" as I said above and get a new drummer, preferably one without a Charlie Chaplin mustache and swastika armbands, and who is always talking about "conquering Poland".

THIS WAS YOUR BIG MISTAKE. What the hell? Drummer Adolf Hitler here says "it's my band now" and you guys just cave? At this point the result is on you, not him, because you let him use you like a baby uses a diaper and for the same purpose.

He totally hijacked your band and you let him. Don't do that again.

This is unfortunately my thoughts also. I'm not saying you and the other members weren't victims. However, there is zero reason to let a new member come in and completely take charge. The drummer was the jerk, but you all let him jerk you around.

If you and the other members can accept and understand where failed yourselves there may be hope to restart the group and head forward with a real direction.
 
Yes, he was being entirely unreasonable. However, that a new guy was able to come in and completely destroy an existing band in such a seemingly short period of time (you didn't specify the time frame, of course), is pretty solid evidence that your band was not, in fact, very solid at all. In the long run, he may have done you a favor by exposing that weakness before too much was committed to it.

Stop second-guessing yourself. It'll only make you hesitant to move forward.

Pretty much my thoughts exactly. Better to start something new with that other guitarist than to keep puttering around with a band that it sounds like no one else was really that committed to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaulJSmith
Every business or social group needs leadership. Democracy doesn't work, not at any level in anything. People with lesser intellect, experience, effort, etc. etc. shouldn't get an equal vote if you want things to work well. Otherwise you'd have your three kids under 10 years old outvoting the two parents to spend the family's entire savings and credit line on Disney merch.

Mutual respect works well however. Of course the singer should get a final veto and everyone's input should be considered, but once it gets down to "well you had three songs so I should get one" it's the beginning of the end. Covers or originals.

That said, OP you stuck to your guns and that's the right thing to do until or unless you future experience tells you to do differently next time.

IMO, it really depends on the list and his reasoning behind it. What worked 10 years ago isn't that relevant, unless he had legit success like casino-level regular bookings.

Best of luck in your next band!
 
Last edited:
As others here said, your band likely wasnt that strong of a unit if that could break it up, so maybe he did you a favor?

Im kind of going through this now but with a singer. We are adding a new singer to our cover band (female singer). We have been going at it for over a year now with this lineup and she came in and started throwing out tons of songs. The drummer was sucking it up like a Hoover Deluxe. We have a setlist in place and said we could add a handful of new ones to get out gigging quickly, but not start over. I get it...have to be able to sing it/people pay attention to the singer/etc, but I dont want to relinquish control entirely to one person. We are a democracy...and although I see the value of a true BL, Ive been playing for a long time (and I run two successful businesses) so "taking orders" from someone so we can play that fantastic dive bar gig for $75 per man is not my style. It usually comes down to "I really like this song" rather than any type of data driven decisions.
 
So the drummer joined the band not liking any of your songs? Sounds like he had the idea of taking over right from the get go and used the singer leaving as his chance to execute the coup. Unfortunately you weren't all on the same page to shut him down immediately when he presented his ultimatum. Once the one guitarist took his side, y'all were doomed.

Previous success or not, carving a set list in stone before you have a singer on board shows a basic lack of understanding of how a good band operates.

Good luck moving on to the next band.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoCal80s
So wait you were in a band and replaced your drummer and the new drummer who joined "your band" wanted to run the show?
The only show he would have been getting from me was me showing him the door. There is a reason why everyone on here at one time or another has mutter the phrase "fire the drummer" now you have gone though it yourself. Find another drummer who is a team player with the same mind set as you guys. good luck RTS
 
4) You are never going to be in a band where everyone completely agrees on the song list. Flexibility is required from everyone.

5) There are about 10,000 songs you could do that would work. Definitely way more than 30.

6) The power in the band is with the person that 1) gets the gigs 2) owns the PA 3) owns the practice spot.

7) Non Singing drummers are easy to replace unless they cover one or more of the areas listed in #6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ekulati and EdO.
The thing about musicians (and people in general) is that they aren't interchangeable parts like in a guitar. Each one different, and we should strive to be able to see through them all (in the real world it's impossible, I know). No doubt the bossy drummer was sending you signals even before he opened his mouth, if you could have recognized them. If there's anything I've learned in life it would be to retain a bit of cynicism with strangers, especially if they claim expert opinions.

The thing about a band is that its members have to work as a team, or it really can't succeed. That, rather than almost all other considerations is highest priority. This drummer walked all over you because you let him. The fact that you lost a member shows me you weren't as cohesive a band as you maybe thought you were. That doesn't make you losers, you just ran into someone who had more nerve and experience at manipulating than you were ready for.

The best advice I could give anybody is to hope for the best but be ready to cope with the worst. That you let this guy stay past the first meeting says that you may be a little naïve. Don't worry, there will be other, even more destructive predators in the entertainment business for you to meet in the future.

I, like many others would like to know what the two song lists looked like.

Good luck, work at being more of a hardass.

Tom
 
Last edited:
Hi all,

This has been on my mind and I wanted to get some opinions...

I had been playing in a new cover band for a few months when things didn't work out with our original drummer. We managed to find a replacement but our singer left shortly after for personal reasons. This prompted our new drummer to call a band meeting in which he informed us that he didn't like our setlist and wanted to come up with his own setlist that we should play. Two days later he brought us a new list which had removed almost all of the thirty or so songs we had already learned.

The drummer also informed us that if we didn't want to play these new songs he wouldn't continue with us. We obliged his request and went along with the plan to begin with but had a few concerns/suggestions with the new setlist which we expressed. This seemed to frustrate him and he asked us to trust him and go along with the plan since he had been in a successful cover band 10 years prior. Even though he said we could choose other songs to add later, it became clear he wouldn't budge from his list of songs.

One of our two guitarists was all for this new plan, but myself and particularly our other guitarist had some reservations. At this point the drummer called me to see if I would continue without this original member to which I refused.

He then immediately posted a message in our group chat saying this wouldn't work and he left. Unfortunately our other guitarist decided to also leave shortly after leaving the band essentially destroyed.

I feel this drummer was being unreasonable, and I'm disappointed that his actions seemed to break up our core group which felt solid beforehand. The drummer claimed we wouldn't go anywhere without following his plan and believed he had the recipe for success. I can't stop thinking about this scenario and whether I did the right thing.

Thoughts? Sorry for long post!
This is the universe telling you it's time for that original project you've been thinking about...