TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
But never say never, Carvin more than ever seem to be listening now to what bassist want. Even there new speaker line is nothing to sneeze at!Carvin doesn't have a P bass pup option. They'll do a lot of things (option 50) but not everything.
Are they? They came out with a good Jazz version but the headstock shape doesn't scream listening to what bassists want. Oh and they still have those 80s headstocks.
But yeah never say never. We started a thread over there @ the Carvin forum about a P pup.
I said the same thing until I played one. it didn't matter what the headstock looked like after that! The judges at Namm agree and gave it the bass of the year award! so you see not every one cares what a headstock looks like it's what the bass sounds and plays like......Are they? They came out with a good Jazz version but the headstock shape doesn't scream listening to what bassists want. Oh and they still have those 80s headstocks.
But yeah never say never. We started a thread over there @ the Carvin forum about a P pup.
Bassists are asking for specific headstock shapes?Are they? They came out with a good Jazz version but the headstock shape doesn't scream listening to what bassists want.
Bassists are asking for specific headstock shapes?![]()
Yeah, I hear ya, but man, these things are just so subjective, and I'm sure they also wouldn't want to copy any of those others for the same reasons, either.I know you're kidding but you, I and most other folks could've done better than a goofy, banana/scimitar shaped headstock that clashes with the body shape. Valenti, AC and of course Sadowsky were able to conjure up nice looking ones.
Don't get me wrong, I have a B50 coming with, yup, an SB headstock but it was a Rosie O Donnell or Whoopi Goldberg choice for me with triple bags and my eyes closed.
Yeah, I hear ya, but man, these things are just so subjective, and I'm sure they also wouldn't want to copy any of those others for the same reasons, either.
Oh, and BTW, both AC and Valenti headstock shapes took a LOT of flack about their looks when they first came out, and the fact that you currently cite them as "nice looking", actually proves my point. The AC was called "bulbous" and the Valenti was compared to a gasping goose or something like that.
HAH! I WIN!
Vic: 1
Gomeztool: 0
Ok, yeah, I'm ribbin' ya, but it is actually true about the initial flack thing on AC and Valenti. Perfect example... thanks.![]()
This isn't the best Photoshop job, but I wondered what the SB5000 would look like if Carvin just flipped the headstock upside down:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
That looks weird to me...
I like the SB headstock as is, not love, but like.
I was speaking to folks at Carvin just today and told them they should expect to hear about P pickups with as popular as I think these SB's will become.I would love it if Carvin offer P pups as an option. Of course, I would want to do a P and the HB. I would name the bass Ballsy. And I would buy a 2Kw head to play it through.
Quick update... my SB5000 should be about a month out. Got the deep orange burst, ebony board with abalone dots, black guard/pickups, flamed top and headstock, blend instead of vol-vol, dunlops.
Lookin' forward to it.![]()
Ok, you can stop talking about that bass now... I almost plugged that bass in too, but I knew what'd happen if I did, so I ran away.![]()
![]()
Now that they have been out for a while, does anyone know if swapping the Vol/Vol setup for a Master Vol/Blend control changes the character of the bass? I had heard early on that it did. And stayed away from that setup. Is that the case?