The whole arrangement is different. Picking on the bass part which is simply supporting the rest of the arrangement is a bit off target, IMO. Don't care for the arrangement vs original? Cool I can understand that. The problem with this kind of tune is if you are going to change anything, it really needs a whole different spin. IMO. Otherwise everyone treats it critically like the NYPhilharmonic performing Beethoven's 5th. IMO.
+1. Checked in with the original, which I'd not heard in years. Whole different pocket, whole different context, different, different, different.
Who cares?
If the arrangement worked in the intended context, cool. And yes, the Sadowsky tone was...killer.
And if nothing else, it was cool to re-connect with the original. I ain't no theory guy, but that original bass synth line is deceptively deep - it hits on 1 after the sixteenth-note pickup, but the slow, deliberate walk of straight eighths into a very heavy 3 - it's like 3 becomes the strong beat of every measure, followed by the lift of those handclaps along with the snare on the 4, both echoing across space before the bass line pick-up note next cycles around. Meanwhile the rhythm guitar, secondary synths and horn lines are percolating along at a syncopated sixteenth-note rate, but that bass line, insistently oozing into that big, fat 3, is like the voice of inevitable doom. The gap between the release off of 3 and the following pick-up, while the clap on 4 echoes through that space - it's the eternal void.
Thanks for the invitation to revisit a classic. You hear these tunes for decades and easily can take them for granted, but going back with fresh ears was a treat.
And now, back to the regularly scheduled program...