is it true wat roger said in the video about the mid range?
he said that boosting the mids may sound pleasant to us when we are playing alone or thru the monitor, but in the audience, boosting the mids only makes the sound muddy.
which is why he uses treble and bass only in his basses.
from TB'ers around here i always heard about how mid's are the key to cutting thru the mix but hmm that goes against everything.
Well, first of all, keep in mind he qualified it pretty strongly to point out "in his opinion" because he knew there's a lot of differing opinions on this.
Also, he was speaking generally of mids, but that was based on context of a pretty specific frequency... the non-crossover point of his preamp, which I believe was down around 250Hz. To me, that's LOW mids, and yeah, you don't cut mixes or add definition that much down there.
IMHO, the midrange is the most critical area to deal with when talking about cutting mixes, but what you do totally depends on your amp, your fingers, your bass, your style, the venue, etc., etc., etc.
In fact, many studio engineers will bump around 400Hz on a Fender bass to help give it identity in the mix, and I'd agree with that based on at least my experiences live cutting mixes, and actually quite nasty ones as well.
While I don't really miss the midrange control on Sadowsky basses due to their native voicing, I do feel that boosting mids, depending on ALL the other circumstances, has great benefits.
Maybe in the context of his basses, especially the Modern/24F soapbar models, yeah, I personally can't see adding mids to those, but for other basses/circumstances, definitely.
...IMHO of course...