TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I won't say retired, as I do have some nice 4's; I do take them out. Just not lots anymore.
Maybe not enough to justify keeping them, but, I've had most of those for decades now. "Tough sell." Lotsa memories in them.
I generally take two basses to any given job; sometimes for requirements, sometimes for diversity, sometimes just cause I have a bunch of basses....
I recently made myself take out two 4-bangers to a job recently, and found, amazingly, I could still get by on basses with 4 strings.
Shocking![]()
Ivan M said:I just drooled all over my MAC......LOL here is a dumb question for the SADOWSKY lovers, once you own and play a five do you end up not playing your fours anymore? Was wondering as they are all expensive and would hate to think that the fours sit around once fivers are around. Just a thought, i would like to get a consensus on this, thanks.
LOL here is a dumb question for the SADOWSKY lovers, once you own and play a five do you end up not playing your fours anymore? Was wondering as they are all expensive and would hate to think that the fours sit around once fivers are around. Just a thought, i would like to get a consensus on this, thanks.

P. Bass said:. . . I'm not sayin' that groove is necessarily exclusive to 4 string players - It's just that a good deal of rhythm section players choose 4 bangers as their bass of choice.
I have to take exception to this one. I think the preference for a five string is simply that -- a preference.
Perhaps there may be a "good number" of rhythm section players playing four strings in modern western pop music, but there are countless other genres out there. Five string dominates the Gospel/r&b world, and there are no better groove players on the planet than they. Not to mention Latin, etc.
All the five really does is offer a few extra notes and a few different options here and there for certain things. It has never once changed my approach to playing or how
I see the roll of a bassist.
All it really does is allow me to play the lines I want to play in E flat!
Just got back from a rehearsal/walkthrough for a gig I am doing this coming weekend. The show is a big benefit deal and the guy that fronts it is a kind of a jazzed up James Taylor for lack of a better descriptor. It's about 70/30 EBG/DB.
I'm playing mostly the modern and the PJ on a couple of blues tunes. I'm altogether jacked about both. But, here's the current rub:
The supplied backline is GB shuttle 6.0 and a GB210. I was not digging it. I very much prefer my F1.
I think for the sake of ease and peace among all the parties (this rig was supplied by a sponsor) I should use it. Any thoughts on getting the best "Sadowsky" sound out of it?
If all else fails, I could probably slip in the F1 easily enough and run it through that GB cab.
I have to take exception to this one. I think the preference for a five string is simply that -- a preference.
Perhaps there may be a "good number" of rhythm section players playing four strings in modern western pop music, but there are countless other genres out there. Five string dominates the Gospel/r&b world, and there are no better groove players on the planet than they. Not to mention Latin, etc.
All the five really does is offer a few extra notes and a few different options here and there for certain things. It has never once changed my approach to playing or how
I see the roll of a bassist.
All it really does is allow me to play the lines I want to play in E flat!
HI
I love 4 strings basses. I have a 5 out of necessity, not because I particularly like it. I find it tougher to play in general. Wider neck, muting worries, etc. Long live the 4 string!!
ROb
I just drooled all over my MAC......LOL here is a dumb question for the SADOWSKY lovers, once you own and play a five do you end up not playing your fours anymore? Was wondering as they are all expensive and would hate to think that the fours sit around once fivers are around. Just a thought, i would like to get a consensus on this, thanks.
In keeping w/ the 4 string "pocket/groove" sensibility, I thought I'd share a quote from the Feb. '08 issue of BP, by John Paul Jones: " It makes the rhythm come alive when you leave holes for the drums to pop out." It's one thing to call it "cliche", but quite another to execute. Groove is a very elusive aspect of rhythm section playing.
I'd like to hear some opinions on who has "groove". I'm not talkin' "chops", although I'd trade all the chops in the world for solid groove.
B.
Edit: Just to clarify - I'm not sayin' that groove is necessarily exclusive to 4 string players - It's just that a good deal of rhythm section players I remember have 4 bangers as their bass of choice. jus' sayin'
Very true.It's just that a good deal of rhythm section players I remember have 4 bangers as their bass of choice. jus' sayin'
I think I'm leaning on letting go of the Tiger WL. It is in brand new condition. I never even took the protective films of the bass. Therefor getting a better price.