TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting how all the car pix posted are foreign...
here's my '76 911. i drove this car for 15 years and put a zillion miles on it:
![]()
Except your own 78 Jazz bass?
Is that granny apple green? Looks close, though there were a couple of different metallic greens (love the 70's colors, with signal orange being my fav). I almost bought a '78 that was granny apple w/cork interior.
Interesting how all the car pix posted are foreign...
And TR, you stay out of this!
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I believe you have made my point for me! Thanks!
It's interesting how defensive folks get about their fine CBS Fenders. Very amusing. I find myself, as an older guy, in the odd position of defending newer "Things" over "the good old days" - because the "good old days" weren't very good! Cars are a fine parallel: Show me a car made in 1975 that wasn't a piece of junk - and yet I am quite sure someone will leap up and defend their Trans Am or Vega... The fact is, manufacturing techniques are *so* much better today than 35 years ago that it's just not funny. The same applies to musical instruments - at least things like Fender basses (and guitars, for that matter!).
it was called ice green metallic and that was it's original color, which happened to be my favorite color on them.
I picked-up, checked-out, borrowed and noodled on countless 1970's Fenders in the store, when they were hanging on the wall brand new or slightly used - So, from my perspective, it is no "Wife's tale".
My sunburst ’70 (my first “real” bass) which has been the standard by which I gage basses for the last 35 years or so, has a great feel, tight neck pocket and finish wise, aside from wear is great.
It is ash and weighs around 1 and a half pounds more then my ’09, not much but noticeable.
My ’09 isn’t built or finished any better than the ’70, but has features like the string through bridge and flatter neck profile which I like.
For what it’s worth they don’t sound alike, but alder/rosewood shouldn’t sound like ash/maple.
I spent a week trying out Jazz basses in every music store around here and the slightly abused ’70 felt, played and sounded much better than the new ‘75/76 Jazzes I tried out which is why I bought it.
Funny in ’09 I also played every Jazz in all the stores around here again, and the one I bought was also the one that stood out from the crowd to me.
MM
2) Well, when a company does MASS production of anything, there will be variation - I learned that years ago, so sure - some just as some pre-CBS fenders will be awful, some post CBS fenders will be dandy... But I think it is willing suspension of disbelief to say that CBS, in their years of ownership, caused Fender's to drop in quality, period. Did some basses get out the door that were good? Sure - but that's not how you gauge quality, is it? I contend that on average any given bass made by Fender before 1966 and after CBS sold out is better than any given bass made in by CBS (particularly when the REALLY started dorking things up, from about '73 on).
I contend that the CBS Fullerton reissues are on average as good as Any instruments Fender has ever made. As for the the 70s Fenders, those of us who like them must just be dumbasses, because your dislike of them proves they are all poorly made instruments. Perhaps you will be available to help me make my next purchase so I won't continue to make bad decisions.
Look, you dig them - that's GREAT. Some folks actually WANT to drive Pintos - I'm cool with that. But if you do need some guidance on your next purchse, I'm available... for a fee!![]()
I guess not. I've read enough of your posts on TB to know that would be a bad idea. No offense.