No. ALL tone and volume are controlled by amp 1/A. The Fender Wiki page explains it clearer-er![]()
So i dont get any power from amp 2? Its basically an extension speaker?
Ps is your talkbass name a spaceballs reference?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No. ALL tone and volume are controlled by amp 1/A. The Fender Wiki page explains it clearer-er![]()
Fender amps have never been 'scooped' and they never will be.
Hmm. That explains why I like to run Lo Mids @ 2, Hi Mids @ 1-2I know this is old (a year), but I just wanted to dispel some of the myths that have been posted:
This is simply untrue, just look at the graph of the frequency response with all EQ on a Rumble at noon:
There's a 4 dB scoop at 600 Hz.
I enjoy my Rumble daily, but they are NOT the most transparent amps out there.
I wouldnt really mind not having the seperate controls, im just seeing if theres a cheaper alternative to buying a 200! I think though with the cost of a (good) splitter, i might just as well bite the bullet and do it.1. Yes and no. You're going through the power section but not the pre-amp. Essentially 2 100W amps with the same tone etc. outta each. 2. Yes-and thanks for getting it View attachment 3169350 View attachment 3169352
I know this is old (a year), but I just wanted to dispel some of the myths that have been posted:
This is simply untrue, just look at the graph of the frequency response with all EQ on a Rumble at noon:
There's a 4 dB scoop at 600 Hz.
I enjoy my Rumble daily, but they are NOT the most transparent amps out there.
with the cost of a (good) splitter,
Of course, both the 100 & 200c have line out so with FOH, yer good either way. We almost never go through the PA so I'm kinda glad I got the 200c but with the lighter weight of the 100, and the fact that I'd rarely need 2, it woulda been a nice option to have. Remember too, you only get the full 200W outta the 200c with an extension spkr. It's 140W by itself-which is more than enough for what I do. With 2-100s A-B,you potentially have 100W outta each amp. I've never had my 200c past 2 o'clock on the volume(OK, once here at the house-dayum!), so you don't hafta to 'dime' it.I wouldnt really mind not having the seperate controls, im just seeing if theres a cheaper alternative to buying a 200! I think though with the cost of a (good) splitter, i might just as well bite the bullet and do it.
May the Schwartz be with you.
It's the import duty that kills ya.It has been mentioned by Linnin in the past that the Rumble is the most transparent amp on the market, which is false.
If you try a Y-Splitter & get noise, you can either go the Send > Return route or shell out for a Radial Engineering BigShot ABY, which has ground lift & a isolation transformer:
View attachment 3169372

Yeah, i figure one more 100 is cheaper than a 200 AND extension cab (to get the full 200) BUT, i do wonder if the 200 on its own would be enough. Might be nice to have a 15.....Of course, both the 100 & 200c have line out so with FOH, yer good either way. We almost never go through the PA so I'm kinda glad I got the 200c but with the lighter weight of the 100, and the fact that I'd rarely need 2, it woulda been a nice option to have. Remember too, you only get the full 200W outta the 200c with an extension spkr. It's 140W by itself-which is more than enough for what I do. With 2-100s A-B,you potentially have 100W outta each amp. I've never had my 200c past 2 o'clock on the volume(OK, once here at the house-dayum!), so you don't hafta to 'dime' it.
Don't get me wrong. I love the 200c, I just wish I'd known the other option. I prolly still woulda gone with the 200. I'm old school-or just old-and I love the depth available with the 15". When I add the 112 cab it(a)puts the 200 up higher where I can hear the 15" and(2)*really warms(?) the tone out front. To my somewhat unreliable ears anyway.Yeah, i figure one more 100 is cheaper than a 200 AND extension cab (to get the full 200) BUT, i do wonder if the 200 on its own would be enough. Might be nice to have a 15.....
Don't get me wrong. I love the 200c, I just wish I'd known the other option. I prolly still woulda gone with the 200. I'm old school-or just old-and I love the depth available with the 15". When I add the 112 cab it(a)puts the 200 up higher where I can hear the 15" and(2)*really warms(?) the tone out front. To my somewhat unreliable ears anyway.
*I never could index
I know this is old (a year), but I just wanted to dispel some of the myths that have been posted:
This is simply untrue, just look at the graph of the frequency response with all EQ on a Rumble at noon:
There's a 4 dB scoop at 600 Hz.
I enjoy my Rumble daily, but they are NOT the most transparent amps out there.
That would depend entirely on what's feeding it.
The power amp is just going to amplify whatever comes in.