• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G. Gould Club!

There's a variety of different flavors of the maple/graphite GG basses before I restarted doing the all-graphite basses. I think those that still have them have the most valid opinions, but they should all have the same internal neck structure.
View attachment 3686895
Not to scale, but should give you the general idea.

Thanks Geoff this is amazing info. Question- does that graphite laminate atop the truss rod run the entire length of the neck? I assume all layers are there to reinforce the neck and stiffen it?

Thanks again!
 
I owned an early Gould 5. It had EMG soap bar pu’s and a maple neck with a carbon fiber veneer on the headstock. It sounded very good and played great.

Given a choice I would rather have a ggi5 than the earlier model with the maple neck.

I also had one of the early GGj5s with a wood neck and carbon fiber veneer on the headstock. Great bass but ultimately I didn't like the profile and carve of the neck which was similar to a jazz bass, rounded deeper back with tight spacing at the nut. I pretty much stopped playing it when I bought a cocobolo GGi5 and eventually sold it. The cocobolo bass was made in 2003 and also has a maple neck so there are definitely GGi5 basses that pre-date the all carbon fiber necks Geoff now uses. I love the neck on my GGi5. It is flatter in back and a lot wider than the neck was on my GGj5. I have a number of basses but the cocobolo GGi5 has my favorite neck. I tried out one of Geoff's basses with the all carbon fiber neck and unfortunately didn't care for the profile, too thin for me to play on comfortably but I can definitely see the appeal.
 
Picked this up yesterday off reverb.... should have it next week. Anyone recognize it? Looking at the bridge, photo blown up, all of the saddles are all the way to the left?

I don’t have any info on it - but it’s beautiful. As for the saddles - the alignment over the pickups and the spacing on the neck looks fairly good. The great thing about that bridge is how much you can adjust and then lock in. I’d probably mess with it to see if I could get the E string in a bit and adjust the rest as needed for spacing. Also, I didn’t see you in the list. Technically, you should be #31, but given your name, I’ll hold 31/32 and just say...
Welcome aboard #33- joeeg33!
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
For those of you that have, or have played on a GGi5 and have compared it to a truss rod era Modulus Q5, how much different is the feel with the slightly wider neck and string spacing? Is the neck profile also thinner?

I have a GGi5 and previously owned a Q5. The slightly flatter/wider neck on the Gould feels fine. It is very comfortable to play. As I recall, the Modulus was thicker but still felt and played great. I do prefer the GGi5 but the difference is slight in the way the necks feel compared to Modulus.
 
I have a GGi5 and previously owned a Q5. The slightly flatter/wider neck on the Gould feels fine. It is very comfortable to play. As I recall, the Modulus was thicker but still felt and played great. I do prefer the GGi5 but the difference is slight in the way the necks feel compared to Modulus.

I agree, the G.Gould necks are sublime. Fastest and easiest playing ever. Over my Zons, Alembics, etc., only thing that comes close is my Status Stealth, mostly for the fret end finish.
 
I have a GGi5 and previously owned a Q5. The slightly flatter/wider neck on the Gould feels fine. It is very comfortable to play. As I recall, the Modulus was thicker but still felt and played great. I do prefer the GGi5 but the difference is slight in the way the necks feel compared to Modulus.

I agree, the G.Gould necks are sublime. Fastest and easiest playing ever. Over my Zons, Alembics, etc., only thing that comes close is my Status Stealth, mostly for the fret end finish.

I have both a GGi4 and a Q5, and I'm about half debating going full Gould because of how awesome the neck is on the GG. I agree, it's one of the absolute fastest and easiest necks I've ever played on. I strap that bass on and I don't want to stop playing. I also just sold a Flea Bass 4 string and there was a pretty massive difference in the overall neck feel. I was never completely comfortable with that one, which is why it was easier to let go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bioflava
I hate to pile on, but I agree with @fauxtoe @Chuck M and @hdfixer.

In 2009, I bought a Modulus Flea 4 (w/ truss rod) and thought I had gone to heaven, but when I bought a G. Gould 4-string, I saw the light. The G. Gould (passive P/J style) bass is way lighter and easier to play -- and the neck is a bit thinner and a bit flatter than the Modulus neck. The Gould is a dream to play.

As I've gotten older, however, I've started playing a 30" Mensinger short-scale... Great bass, but I miss the graphite! Dear @GeoffGould -- would you consider making a 30" or 32" scale bass?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: daddymactx
I have both a GGi4 and a Q5, and I'm about half debating going full Gould because of how awesome the neck is on the GG. I agree, it's one of the absolute fastest and easiest necks I've ever played on. I strap that bass on and I don't want to stop playing. I also just sold a Flea Bass 4 string and there was a pretty massive difference in the overall neck feel. I was never completely comfortable with that one, which is why it was easier to let go.
keep in mind also that the necks on the q5 and f.u. 5 are 2.75" at the 24th fret (17mm spacing at the bridge) and the ggi5 is 3" at the 24th fret (18mm spacing). so that's also something to consider. fyi.
 
keep in mind also that the necks on the q5 and f.u. 5 are 2.75" at the 24th fret (17mm spacing at the bridge) and the ggi5 is 3" at the 24th fret (18mm spacing). so that's also something to consider. fyi.

Yeah, that's something that I'd be a little bit concerned about, but not overly. I've been really used to the 17mm spacing and 2.75" necks on my 5 strings (I have an FB5 as well). It's not that I can't play a wider neck, it's just that I find the Modulus specs to be about right. I know for sure that I can't do 19mm on a 5 string and 18mm is about my limit so long as the neck is comfortable. Geoff's website has the string spacing as 17.5mm, but I think he's said before it's more like 18mm-ish.
 
Yeah, that's something that I'd be a little bit concerned about, but not overly. I've been really used to the 17mm spacing and 2.75" necks on my 5 strings (I have an FB5 as well). It's not that I can't play a wider neck, it's just that I find the Modulus specs to be about right. I know for sure that I can't do 19mm on a 5 string and 18mm is about my limit so long as the neck is comfortable. Geoff's website has the string spacing as 17.5mm, but I think he's said before it's more like 18mm-ish.
thought i'd bring it up if others are familiar with wider spacing at the bridge (17.5 up to 19mm).

the 'narrower' width of the modulus necks might have your 'b' and 'g' strings slipping off the fretboard.

i preferred 18mm for decades; hence my aversion for modulus necks due to aggressive play on the 'g' string and having it slip off the fretboard in not-so-ideal situations (nothing like having an eye or two glance your way when you hear a 'thwank' as the 'g' string gets pulled off the fretboard...).

now that i've also gotten along in years, my spacing preference is 17.5mm and geoff's necks (3") are darn perfect for me. customer for life...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeoffGould
Yeah, that's something that I'd be a little bit concerned about, but not overly. I've been really used to the 17mm spacing and 2.75" necks on my 5 strings (I have an FB5 as well). It's not that I can't play a wider neck, it's just that I find the Modulus specs to be about right. I know for sure that I can't do 19mm on a 5 string and 18mm is about my limit so long as the neck is comfortable. Geoff's website has the string spacing as 17.5mm, but I think he's said before it's more like 18mm-ish.

I think that’s right, but keep in mind that the bridge on the GGi5 is laterally adjustable. So you can make it bit narrower or wider if you want.
When switching back and forth from a 4 string p bass to a 5, I found the string spacing mattered more than the overall fingerboard width. So the slightly wider spacing on the GGi5 was more comfortable than any narrower necked basses with correspondingly narrower spacing. Though it does help that the neck profile is pretty flat...