• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L Club Part 7

Since @armyadarkness brought up Vintage G&L's I thought I'd go ahead and post a couple of my 82 in Natural.

View attachment 3061228
View attachment 3061229
View attachment 3061230

Lots of Birdseye and flame in the Neck. You can really see the Birdseye in the headstock. She had a pretty rough life before I got hold of her. Eventually I'm going to refinish in Butterscotch since the original finish is already gone and I'm really not fond of Natural Finishes on light wood. No Offense!!


Gorgeous! I love Birdseye, and definitely need to order one sometime.

On a related note, you mentioned this instrument being "vintage", and apologies if this has been covered already somewhere in the hundreds of pages of this thread, but I'm curious if there is a general consensus amongst G&L fans as to what would constitute vintage, given that the brand is relatively new when compared to Fender or Gibson.

Is it age? Anything under Leo's watch? I know that GC's completely useless definition is anything 25+ years old, which would put that recent ASAT Special I just purchase (awesome, btw!) on the cusp of being vintage, even though it's post-Leo in 1994.

I checked in with TGP to get an idea of what they thought across brands, and apparently there isn't much consensus there, so I was wondering what would "vintage" mean in the narrower G&L world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjbassist
Gorgeous! I love Birdseye, and definitely need to order one sometime.

On a related note, you mentioned this instrument being "vintage", and apologies if this has been covered already somewhere in the hundreds of pages of this thread, but I'm curious if there is a general consensus amongst G&L fans as to what would constitute vintage, given that the brand is relatively new when compared to Fender or Gibson.

Is it age? Anything under Leo's watch? I know that GC's completely useless definition is anything 25+ years old, which would put that recent ASAT Special I just purchase (awesome, btw!) on the cusp of being vintage, even though it's post-Leo in 1994.

I checked in with TGP to get an idea of what they thought across brands, and apparently there isn't much consensus there, so I was wondering what would "vintage" mean in the narrower G&L world.

I wouldn't call my '89 "vintage," even though GC would. Honestly, I'd be hard pressed to call anything <40 years vintage, but for whatever reason I'd be more inclined to call an '82 L2k vintage than an '82 Fender. Just something about the age in the spectrum of the product line. I don't think it's an easily-definable term, though I get why people try and define it with an arbitrary number.
 
Since @armyadarkness brought up Vintage G&L's I thought I'd go ahead and post a couple of my 82 in Natural.

View attachment 3061228
View attachment 3061229
View attachment 3061230

Lots of Birdseye and flame in the Neck. You can really see the Birdseye in the headstock. She had a pretty rough life before I got hold of her. Eventually I'm going to refinish in Butterscotch since the original finish is already gone and I'm really not fond of Natural Finishes on light wood. No Offense!!
Got your twin:
gl l2k toro.jpg
 
Five weeks since making my order for the LB-100 and am starting to get really excited, even though I know it's heading to the dealer from the factory for set up. I am stoked to work on some old school P lines and make that baby hit those classic mids. I am fairly new to bass, and wonder if I should eventually move to flat-wounds on the P? My Fender AEPJ and Lakland long scale HB both have rounds.
 
Five weeks since making my order for the LB-100 and am starting to get really excited, even though I know it's heading to the dealer from the factory for set up. I am stoked to work on some old school P lines and make that baby hit those classic mids. I am fairly new to bass, and wonder if I should eventually move to flat-wounds on the P? My Fender AEPJ and Lakland long scale HB both have rounds.

Only you can decide that. I have been a roundwound player forever, I like the brighter snappier tone from rounds. I have tried a couple of flats over the last couple years and removed them with in a month of putting them on. I tried one more time nearly a year ago with Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats and I really like them. They sound like rounds to me and they have lasted, the 1st set has been on my P bass for that long and they still have not gone dead or mellow or whatever you want to call it.

I will caveat that by saying I think strings are highly dependent on a persons body chemistry and what works for me may not work for you. For instance, I don't get along with GHS Boomers (among others) they go dead in 2 weeks on me. I know many people swear by them and get great life out of them. Me, not so much.

Anyway your choice of strings depends on what you're after tone wise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soulman969