• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Genzler Amplification Club

18934B1A-340C-4EBF-9D0F-A9B734519994.jpeg
What would be the pros and cons of running my MG350 through two of the 10-2s instead of my current 210 vert stack pictured here?
Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: S-Bigbottom
View attachment 2898505 What would be the pros and cons of running my MG350 through two of the 10-2s instead of my current 210 vert stack pictured here?
Thanks

I've played both the GK's and Genzler's MG series. The Genzler's have a lot more punch and low end than the GK.

I've only played the 10-2 in a store, and I agree you would get better dispersion, but that cab is a little more modernly voiced compared to the MG series, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: svtb15
I got to play the Magellan 800 at last nights gig with 2 TC Electronic RS210 cabs and I am a very happy camper:
Magellan.jpg

With Gain at 11:00, Master at 10:00, EQ flat, and Contour A set at 8:00 this amp was not only full, loud and articulate but also thumping pretty hard. And just as svtb15 had stated previously, the notes were coming in so strong that I found myself not needing that much volume and turning down. Very easy to hear yourself as well as feel it.

I know this is probably all old news to you all, but I just had to let everyone know how much I really like this amp. And no this is not the honeymoon period speaking, this amp really does kick a$$. I'm also glad I purchased this amp new so that Jeff Genzler can make some money off me, he deserves it. :thumbsup:
 
I played my 5 string thru the BA12-3 and the 112T with the Magellan 800 at the music store yesterday. I assumed I would like the BA12-3 better because it is the newer design, and the concept makes sense in the BA12-3 to unload more of the mids from the whoofer to the array of smaller speakers. Both cabs could make the walls and furniture dance and had great clarity. BUT after trying them back and forth for an hour I thought the 112T had the better mids and overall clarity. Has anyone else tried both? Which cab did you prefer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: emjazz
I played my 5 string thru the BA12-3 and the 112T with the Magellan 800 at the music store yesterday. I assumed I would like the BA12-3 better because it is the newer design, and the concept makes sense in the BA12-3 to unload more of the mids from the whoofer to the array of smaller speakers. Both cabs could make the walls and furniture dance and had great clarity. BUT after trying them back and forth for an hour I thought the 112T had the better mids and overall clarity. Has anyone else tried both? Which cab did you prefer?
Quite honestly, I could be happy with either. But I chose the Arrays due to dispersion characteristics.
 
I played my 5 string thru the BA12-3 and the 112T with the Magellan 800 at the music store yesterday. I assumed I would like the BA12-3 better because it is the newer design, and the concept makes sense in the BA12-3 to unload more of the mids from the whoofer to the array of smaller speakers. Both cabs could make the walls and furniture dance and had great clarity. BUT after trying them back and forth for an hour I thought the 112T had the better mids and overall clarity. Has anyone else tried both? Which cab did you prefer?

I came to a similar conclusion as you, but I chose both as they tended to fill in the sonic gaps each have by themselves, it's probably my favorite tone, running them both together, 112t on top.
 
I run my Genzler BA210-3 array this week vertical instead of the normal way and loved what I was hearing. Seemed to really make a difference for me to hear better from the night before when I was in the same venue trying the 1 cab the regular way. It definitely allowed me to hear better.