My slighty modded DC. Lovin this little beastie. Might put a thunderbucker in it
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks!
Oh yeah, I keep some DeOxit spray around.I guess the trick is getting it where it'll do any good.
I have been using this Fader Lube rather than cleaner lately. Some people claim that contact cleaner can eventually damage internal workings of a pot, but no clue if its true. I have been using this on several applications and it has gotten rid of scratchy pots on basses and amps. A friend used this lube on the pots that were cutting out on a very old Les Paul JR. Problem has not returned since. As always, YMMV.
https://www.amazon.com/Hosa-F5S-H6-...argid=aud-801381245258:pla-403917107227&psc=1
Deoxit (the variety I and I think most people around here use) has similar lubrication properties.
it is a very good point you make that many need reminding of.
Do you use Hosa D5S-6 Caig DeoxIT cleaner? That sounds like a cleaner/lube that is a good alternative to the fader lube I linked to. I will pick that up next time I need to order a new can.
Thanks!
Oh yeah, I keep some DeOxit spray around.I guess the trick is getting it where it'll do any good.
Hi there mates,
I want to get rid of the noisy Bartolini TCT preamp that came with my Gibson Les Paul Bass (early 90s). Has someone here done it before?
I also would like to know if I need to buy something else like new pots, capacitors, wires, jacks, etc. I think that it is not really necessary to get anything since the pots are already 500k each and the instrument jack... is just a jack... maybe a capacitor?
Thanks in advance!
Do you want to go with passive controls or replace with another preamp?
First I was thinking of getting a switch so I could bypass the preamp without getting rid of it, but now I think that I would rather just go fully passive.
Adding an active/passive switch shouldn't be too bad. If you think you would use in passive more often I personally would just pull all the electronics and do all new passive controls. You could just rewire and re-use you current pots and just add a cap. For the money I would go all new (especially if the bass isn't new). Either way can be done.
Depends on how it is wired. Is it similar to this?
View attachment 3615419
Guessing you have four knobs and no mid pot you would need to wire like this:
View attachment 3615420
I used to own a Gibson LP Standard bass that had a Bart preamp in it. I wanted the ability to go passive with it so changed the tone pot to a push/pull pot. It allowed me to switch between active/passive without adding any new switches or holes to the bass. That was a good 10 years ago so I don't remember how it was wired up, just that it was a long shaft on the pot due to the arched top of the LP shape.
I briefly owned this LP bass with a flat top. Had thought about gutting it and making it all passive but didn't own it long enough to get to that. Great bass but I traded it towards something else.
View attachment 3615573
Hey man, thanks. I have the other model which has the black plastic covers on it and it has the tb+ and the Bartolini preamp. Yes, I think that what you say could be an option as well, but isn't it better go fully passive? I mean the tone will be the same when bypassed to passive as if will be completely passive?
...my Les Paul Triumph
Woah - how'd I miss that one!? Very cool bass, and I should've known you would have one. (I think we must have come from the same crop)
I'm pretty sure that's what Jimmy J. was playing right before he got his first Alembic.![]()