• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Got my GK MB Fusion today!!!!

Chef,

Unfortunately I personally can't deal with calling the manufacturer, shipping the amp, being without it for a while...

For me a product has to work all the time. I cannot afford to have an amp shutting down in the middle of a show.
 
After some more play time, let me reiterate:
I love the tone outta this thing! Flat even!
For me, it seems like a great "Micro M9,", but this is all at home some far.

Work starts tonight...
 
Me too!
Jazz trio tonight with the head and one 112; rock gig tomorrow with head and both cabs, a wedding reception I know nothing about Sat am, and another club gig Sat night.
 
Me too!
Jazz trio tonight with the head and one 112; rock gig tomorrow with head and both cabs, a wedding reception I know nothing about Sat am, and another club gig Sat night.

So far, do you feel like this has the " GK Tone ", or is it something different ?
 
GK all the way.
The tubes "don't soften it a lot," and it's a nice aggressive, bright, snarly tone.

I can't say I'm a big fan of the overdriven tone, but that statement applies across the board for all maps, to me, as that's just not my bag.
 
So Chef you find the MB Fusion to be in the same tone universe as the Mesa M6/M9? I wonder if the MB800 will be even closer in terms of heft and headroom?
Maybe another lightweight solution would be a Genz 9.2 using the FET channel: a good amount of power and that tight and bright slightly aggressive voicing?
Sorry for the derail, the whole M9 in a smaller package question caught my eye...
 
So Chef you find the MB Fusion to be in the same tone universe as the Mesa M6/M9? I wonder if the MB800 will be even closer in terms of heft and headroom?
Maybe another lightweight solution would be a Genz 9.2 using the FET channel: a good amount of power and that tight and bright slightly aggressive voicing?
Sorry for the derail, the whole M9 in a smaller package question caught my eye...

The MB800 is right there in the same tonal ballpark, and it hit like a ton of bricks! :bassist: :bassist: :bassist: I have very high expectations for this head. :cool:
 
Yessir, I do, so far, having not gigged it...
So far, I can't see needing more watts either, but, again, this is "untried."

With the two Neo112's I have, it's frightening, really.
Same with my UL410.
In both cases, input gain at 11, master at about 10 oclock, eq flat, with bass trimmed a tad...it's freaking huge and knarly man.

Pretty awesome ''living room'' results.

The only downside I see so far is this:
the input pad ''pads too much,'' sucking the life out of things.
with a hot bass, I get better results dialing down input gain a tad, compared to using the active pad.

So Chef you find the MB Fusion to be in the same tone universe as the Mesa M6/M9?
 
The only downside I see so far is this:
the input pad ''pads too much,'' sucking the life out of things.
with a hot bass, I get better results dialing down input gain a tad, compared to using the active pad.
Seems to be the case with most GK products I've used. Input pad = much less tone.

The MB Fusion is something extra-special, although I've yet to gig mine. I owned the Fusion 550 for a short while and didn't like it nearly as much as this little tone monster!

MB Fusion 800 anyone? :hiding: